首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health policy >Commentary: Approaches, strengths, and limitations of avoidable mortality
【24h】

Commentary: Approaches, strengths, and limitations of avoidable mortality

机译:评论:可避免死亡率的方法,优势和局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Publication of recent papers such as the one by Schoenbaum and colleagues entitled 'Mortality Amenable to Health Care in the United States: The Roles of Demographics and Health Systems Performance' has stimulated this commentary. We discuss strengths and limitations of amenable and avoidable mortality in health-care systems' performance and their contribution to health inequalities. To illustrate, we present a case study of avoidable and amenable mortality in Spain over 27 years. We conclude that amenable mortality is not a good indicator of health-care systems' performance, or for determining whether it could give rise to health inequalities. To understand health problems and to assess the impact of interventions affecting health requires good, basic, and routine monitoring of health indicators and of socioeconomic determinants of health.
机译:Schoenbaum及其同事发表的题为“适合美国卫生保健的死亡率:人口统计学和卫生系统绩效的作用”的最新论文的发表激起了这一评论。我们讨论了卫生保健系统绩效中可避免的死亡率的优点和局限性及其对健康不平等的贡献。为了说明这一点,我们在西班牙进行了27年可避免和可改善的死亡率案例研究。我们得出的结论是,适当的死亡率并不是衡量卫生保健系统绩效或确定其是否会引起卫生不平等的良好指标。要了解健康问题并评估干预措施对健康的影响,就需要对健康指标和健康的社会经济决定因素进行良好,基本和常规的监控。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号