首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Agriculture as an upholder of cultural heritage? Conceptualizations and value judgements--A Norwegian perspective in international context.
【24h】

Agriculture as an upholder of cultural heritage? Conceptualizations and value judgements--A Norwegian perspective in international context.

机译:农业作为文化遗产的支持者?概念化和价值判断-国际背景下的挪威视角。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The multifunctional role of agriculture as a producer of collective goods in addition to food and fibre, has been stressed within the context of negotiations on the liberalization of the world market for food (WTO) and in general in discussions concerning restructuring of the agricultural sector. One of these collective goods, cultural heritage, is connected to agricultural practice and covers objects, sites and areas influenced by agricultural activity, as well as experience based knowledge of work, resource utilization and management. Agriculture is seen both as a threat to and a caretaker of cultural heritage. This double role is recognized in Norway, although the responsibility of the agricultural sector as a caretaker of cultural heritage is stressed. This article investigates the connection between agriculture and cultural heritage as expressed by public and private actors who define the policy agenda, namely the cultural heritage or environmental, the agricultural and tourism sectors. This is done by analysing explicit and implicit value judgements in central concepts like "cultural heritage", "active agriculture" and "added value". The Norwegian case is compared to the international context. The analysis shows that within a Nordic context active farming and cultural heritage is positively linked and the farmer is seen as a major caretaker, while in documents from dominant international actors cultural heritage is seen as something on the side of active farming. Although differences reflect some actual variation in the consequences of agricultural practices, it is clear that concepts serve as 'legitimizing tools' placing central actors within a specific political agenda.
机译:在关于世界粮食市场自由化的谈判中以及总体上有关农业部门结构调整的讨论中,强调了农业除粮食和纤维外还作为集体产品生产者的多功能作用。这些集体产品之一是文化遗产,与农业实践有关,涵盖受农业活动影响的对象,场所和区域,以及基于经验的工作,资源利用和管理知识。农业被视为对文化遗产的威胁和看守。尽管强调了农业部门作为文化遗产的看守者的责任,但这种双重作用在挪威已得到认可。本文研究了界定政策议程的公共和私人行为者所表达的农业与文化遗产之间的联系,即文化遗产或环境,农业和旅游业。这是通过分析诸如“文化遗产”,“活跃农业”和“增值”等核心概念中的显性和隐性价值判断来完成的。挪威的情况与国际情况进行了比较。分析表明,在北欧语境下,活跃的农业活动与文化遗产有着积极的联系,农民被视为主要的看守者,而在国际主要参与者的文件中,文化遗产则被视为活跃的农业活动。尽管差异反映了农业实践后果的某些实际差异,但很明显,概念是将中央参与者置于特定政治议程中的“合法化工具”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号