首页> 外文期刊>Journal of refractive surgery >Anterior segment biometry using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
【24h】

Anterior segment biometry using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

机译:使用光谱域光学相干断层扫描的前节生物测定法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the anterior chamber and anterior chamber angle measurements obtained with spectral-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and time-domain AS-OCT. METHODS: The anterior chamber of healthy participants was imaged with spectral-domain AS-OCT (Casia SS-1000; Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) and time-domain AS-OCT (Visante; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), angle opening distance at 500 and 750 μm (AOD 500 and AOD 750), trabecular iris space area at 500 and 750 μm (TISA 500 and TISA 750), and scleral spur angle were measured. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. The Pearson correlation test was used to evaluate the correlation between the measurements and Bland-Altman plots to evaluate the agreement. RESULTS: One hundred one eyes of 101 healthy participants were analyzed. Excellent repeatability was found with both devices for CCT, AOD 500, AOD 750, TISA 750, and scleral spur angle (ICC = 0.90 to 0.98 and 0.89 to 0.97, respectively) and excellent to moderate repeatability was found for TISA 500 (ICC = 0.68 to 0.97 and 0.70 to 0.93, respectively). For all parameters, Casia and Visante measurements were significantly correlated (r = 0.76 to 0.98; P < .02). ACD measured with the Casia was significantly larger (mean difference = 0.12 ± 0.08 mm; P < .0001), and the scleral spur angle measured with the Casia was significantly lower (mean difference = 4.85° ± 5.30°; P < .01). There were nonsignificant differences between the devices for the other parameters (P > .06). CONCLUSIONS: Both Casia and Visante AS-OCT demonstrate high repeatability. Except for the ACD and scleral spur angles, the two devices show good agreement.
机译:目的:比较通过光谱域前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)和时域AS-OCT获得的前房和前房角度测量结果。方法:健康参与者的前房通过光谱域AS-OCT(Casia SS-1000; Tomey,名古屋,日本)和时域AS-OCT(Visante; Carl Zeiss Meditec,CA,都柏林)进行成像。中央角膜厚度(CCT),前房深度(ACD),500和750μm处的角打开距离(AOD 500和AOD 750),小梁虹膜间隔区域为500和750μm(TISA 500和TISA 750)和巩膜骨刺测量角度。计算组内相关系数(ICC)。皮尔逊相关检验用于评估测量值与Bland-Altman图之间的相关性,以评估一致性。结果:对101名健康参与者的110只眼进行了分析。对于CCT,AOD 500,AOD 750,TISA 750和巩膜尖角(ICC分别为0.90至0.98和0.89至0.97),这两种设备均具有出色的可重复性(TISA 500)(ICC = 0.68)分别为0.97和0.70至0.93)。对于所有参数,Casia和Visante测量值均显着相关(r = 0.76至0.98; P <.02)。用Casia测得的ACD明显更大(平均差异= 0.12±0.08 mm; P <.0001),而用Casia测得的巩膜骨尖角明显更低(平均差异= 4.85°±5.30°; P <.01) 。对于其他参数,设备之间没有显着差异(P> .06)。结论:Casia和Visante AS-OCT均显示出高重复性。除ACD和巩膜正角外,这两种装置显示出良好的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号