【24h】

A randomized comparison of three insemination methods in an artificial insemination program using husbands' semen.

机译:在使用丈夫精液的人工授精程序中三种授精方法的随机比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy rates with single intrauterine insemination (SIUI), double intrauterine insemination (DIUI) and fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP). STUDY DESIGN: Ninety patients undergoing a standard ovarian stimulation regimen were randomized to receive SIUI, DIUI or FSP. The end point was either pregnancy or completion of 3 treatment cycles without pregnancy. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographic data or ovarian responses. The total number of motile spermatozoa inseminated in the FSP group was significantly lower than in the SIUI group. No significant differences were found in pregnancy rate per cycle or patient, multiple pregnancy rate and outcome of pregnancy between the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Similar pregnancy rates were achieved after SIUI, DIUI and FSP during stimulated cycles.
机译:目的:比较单胎子宫内授精(SIUI),双胎子宫内授精(DIUI)和输卵管精子灌注(FSP)的妊娠率。研究设计:90名接受标准卵巢刺激方案的患者被随机分配接受SIUI,DIUI或FSP。终点是怀孕或完成3个不怀孕的治疗周期。结果:人口统计学数据或卵巢反应无差异。 FSP组受精的活动精子总数显着低于SIUI组。 3组之间在每个周期或患者的妊娠率,多重妊娠率和妊娠结局方面均无显着差异。结论:在刺激周期中,SIUI,DIUI和FSP后的妊娠率相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号