首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Reproductive Medicine: The Official Periodical of the American Academy of Reproductive Medicine, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, International Family Planning Research Association ... [et al.] >Management of the perineum during forceps delivery. Association of episiotomy with the frequency and severity of perineal trauma in women undergoing forceps delivery.
【24h】

Management of the perineum during forceps delivery. Association of episiotomy with the frequency and severity of perineal trauma in women undergoing forceps delivery.

机译:镊子分娩时会阴的管理。会阴切开术与接受钳子分娩的妇女会阴部创伤的频率和严重程度相关。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of the frequency and severity of perineal trauma with episiotomy performed at forceps delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study analyzed all forceps deliveries at the Semmelweis Women's Hospital Vienna between February 1999 and July 1999. Evaluation of a possible association of episiotomy with the frequency and severity of perineal trauma was the main objective of the study. Episiotomy was not performed routinely and was either midline or mediolateral. RESULTS: In conjunction with forceps delivery episiotomy, 76/87 women (87%) underwent forceps delivery episiotomy; among those, 49/76 (64%) had a mediolateral episiotomy and 27/76 (36%) a midline episiotomy. The frequency and severity of perineal tears were significantly lower in forceps deliveries when an episiotomy was performed. When analyzing the type of episiotomy, the data revealed a statistically significantly lower frequency of perineal trauma when mediolateral episiotomy was performed as compared to midline episiotomy. CONCLUSION: If obstetric indications necessitate forceps delivery, performance of an episiotomy decreases the risk of perineal tears of all degrees. When analyzing the type of episiotomy, mediolateral episiotomy seems to be more protective against perineal trauma in women undergoing forceps delivery.
机译:目的:探讨会阴部创伤的频率和严重程度与在产钳时进行会阴切开的关系。研究设计:这项回顾性研究分析了1999年2月至1999年7月在维也纳Semmelweis妇女医院进行的所有钳子的分娩。评估会阴切开术与会阴部创伤的频率和严重性之间可能的联系是本研究的主要目标。会阴切开术不是常规的,而是中线或中外侧。结果:76/87名妇女(87%)与钳子送检近交切开术相结合;其中,有49/76(64%)人进行了中外侧会阴切开术,而27/76(36%)人进行了中线会阴切开术。会阴切开术时,分娩时会阴撕裂的频率和严重性明显降低。当分析会阴切开术的类型时,与中线切开术相比,数据显示进行中外侧切开术会阴部创伤的频率在统计学上显着降低。结论:如果产科指征需要钳子分娩,会阴切开术会降低所有程度会阴撕裂的风险。在分析会阴切开术的类型时,对于接受分娩钳子的妇女,前外侧会阴切开术似乎对会阴部创伤更具保护作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号