首页> 外文期刊>Clinical immunology: The official journal of the Clinical Immunology Society >Type 1 diabetes intervention trials: what have we learned? A critical review of selected intervention trials.
【24h】

Type 1 diabetes intervention trials: what have we learned? A critical review of selected intervention trials.

机译:1型糖尿病干预试验:我们学到了什么?对所选干预试验的严格审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Developing therapies to stop or slow the immune destruction of islets has been a goal of investigators in type 1 diabetes for several decades. This review of clinical interventions in patients with type 1 diabetes indicates both negative and positive outcomes with a variety of different therapeutic agents. An underlying theme of this article is that differences in study design may impact the outcome more than the therapy being tested. Thus, each of these results need to be considered in the context of important variables in study design. To date, there is no clear answer as to what study design is best to determine if an agent is effective against the diabetes disease process; however, the Immunology of Diabetes Society has recently developed guidelines for the conduct of these trials to facilitate comparisons of therapies in the future.
机译:数十年来,开发用于停止或减慢胰岛免疫破坏的疗法一直是1型糖尿病研究者的目标。这项对1型糖尿病患者的临床干预措施的综述表明,使用多种不同的治疗药物均可产生阴性和阳性结果。本文的一个基本主题是,研究设计的差异对结果的影响可能大于所测试的疗法。因此,这些结果中的每一个都需要在研究设计中的重要变量的背景下加以考虑。迄今为止,对于哪种研究设计最能确定一种药物是否能有效抵抗糖尿病的疾病尚无明确答案。然而,糖尿病免疫学会最近为进行这些试验制定了指南,以利于将来对疗法的比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号