首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health >Socio-demographic patterning of referral, uptake and attendance in Physical Activity Referral Schemes.
【24h】

Socio-demographic patterning of referral, uptake and attendance in Physical Activity Referral Schemes.

机译:体育人口转诊计划中转诊,摄取和出勤的社会人口统计学模式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Inadequate monitoring and participant profiling have so far prevented a detailed examination of who Physical Activity Referral Schemes (PARS) are accessible to and appropriate for. As a result, the nature of the role for PARS within public health is unknown. METHODS: Participants were all those referred to a countywide PARS during a three-year period (n 3568). Participant age, gender and the deprivation level and rurality of their area of residence were compared with the average for the county population. Characteristics associated with referral uptake (attending >/=1 exercise session) and completion (>/=80% attendance), were identified using logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared with the county average, participants were older, more predominantly female (61.1 vs 51.4%) and lived in more deprived areas (p < 0.001). Referral uptake (n = 2864) was most likely in those aged 60-69 years, and least likely for residents of rural villages and the most deprived areas (all p < 0.001). For participants who took up referral, completion was most likely in men and the over-seventies (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PARS format may be inappropriate for younger adults or people living in relative deprivation and rural areas. They appear most appropriate for adults of middle-to-old age who are more likely to require supervision, and should be targeted accordingly.
机译:背景:迄今为止,监测和参加者概况分析不充分,无法详细检查谁可以参加并适合谁参加体育锻炼推荐计划(PARS)。结果,在公共卫生中PARS的作用的性质是未知的。方法:参加者均为在三年期间被转至全县PARS的患者(n 3568)。将参加者的年龄,性别以及其居住地区的贫困水平和农村地区与该县人口的平均水平进行比较。使用逻辑回归确定与推荐摄入量(参加锻炼> / = 1锻炼课程)和完成情况(> / = 80%出勤)相关的特征。结果:与县平均水平相比,参与者年龄更大,女性占更多比例(61.1 vs 51.4%),并且生活在贫困地区(p <0.001)。在60-69岁的人群中,引荐摄取量(n = 2864)最有可能,而农村居民和最贫困地区的居民则不太可能接受引荐摄取(所有p <0.001)。对于接受转诊的参与者,完成率最高的是男性和七十年代(p <0.001)。结论:PARS格式可能不适合年轻人或生活在相对贫困和农村地区的人们。它们似乎最适合需要监督的中至中年成年人,因此应有针对性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号