首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >An In Vivo Evaluation of Fit of Zirconium-Oxide Based Ceramic Single Crowns, Generated with Two CAD/CAM Systems, in Comparison to Metal Ceramic Single Crowns
【24h】

An In Vivo Evaluation of Fit of Zirconium-Oxide Based Ceramic Single Crowns, Generated with Two CAD/CAM Systems, in Comparison to Metal Ceramic Single Crowns

机译:与金属陶瓷单冠相比,使用两个CAD / CAM系统生成的基于氧化锆的陶瓷单冠的体内评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess in vivo the marginal fit of single crowns produced using two CAD/CAM all-ceramic systems, in comparison to more traditional metal ceramic crowns. Materials and Methods: Thirty vital, caries-free, and previously untreated teeth were chosen in five patients who needed extraction for implant placement and therefore were included in this study. In the control group (C), 10 regular metal ceramic crowns with porcelain occlusal surfaces were fabricated. In the other two groups (Z and E), CAD/CAM technology was used for the fabrication of 20 zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single crowns with two systems. All zirconia crowns were cemented with glass-ionomer cement, always following the manufacturer's instructions. The same dentist carried out all clinical phases. The teeth were extracted 1 month later. Marginal gaps along vertical planes were measured for each crown, using a total of four landmarks for each tooth by means of a microscope at a magnification of 50×. On completion of microscopic evaluation, representative specimens from each group were prepared for ESEM evaluation. Mean and standard deviations of the four landmarks (mesial, distal, buccal, palatal) at each single crown were calculated for each group. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed to determine whether the four landmarks, taken into consideration together, differed between groups. Two-way ANOVA was performed to study in detail, for each landmark, how the three systems used to produce the FPDs affected the gap measurements. Differences were considered to be significant at p < 0.05. Results: MANOVA revealed no quantitative differences of the four landmarks, when taken into consideration together, between the three groups (p < 0.0001). Two-way ANOVA, performed at each landmark, revealed no quantitative differences between the three groups (p < 0.0001 for each landmark). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the two zirconium-oxide-based ceramic CAD/CAM systems demonstrated a similar and acceptable marginal fit when compared to more traditional metal ceramic crowns.
机译:目的:这项研究的目的是评估与两个传统的金属陶瓷冠相比,使用两个CAD / CAM全陶瓷系统生产的单个冠的边缘适应性。材料和方法:在需要拔除种植体的五位患者中,选择了30颗重要的,无龋的和先前未治疗的牙齿,因此被纳入本研究。在对照组(C)中,制造了10个具有瓷咬合表面的规则金属陶瓷冠。在其他两组(Z和E)中,CAD / CAM技术用于制造带有两个系统的20个氧化锆基陶瓷单冠。始终遵循制造商的说明,将所有氧化锆冠冠都用玻璃离聚物水泥固结。同一位牙医完成了所有临床阶段。 1个月后拔出牙齿。通过显微镜以50倍的放大率对每个牙齿使用总共四个界标来测量每个牙冠沿垂直平面的边缘间隙。显微镜评估完成后,准​​备每组的代表性样品进行ESEM评估。对于每个组,计算每个单个冠部的四个界标(中,远端,颊、,)的平均和标准偏差。进行了多元方差分析(MANOVA),以确定在一起考虑的四个界标之间是否存在差异。进行了双向方差分析,以针对每个界标详细研究用于生产FPD的三个系统如何影响间隙测量。在p <0.05时差异被认为是显着的。结果:当同时考虑时,MANOVA显示三组之间四个界标之间没有定量差异(p <0.0001)。在每个地标上进行的双向方差分析显示三组之间没有定量差异(每个地标p <0.0001)。结论:在这项研究的限制内,得出的结论是,与更传统的金属陶瓷牙冠相比,两种基于氧化锆的陶瓷CAD / CAM系统显示出相似且可接受的边缘配合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号