...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Fracture resistance of three ceramic inlay-retained fixed partial denture designs. An in vitro comparative study.
【24h】

Fracture resistance of three ceramic inlay-retained fixed partial denture designs. An in vitro comparative study.

机译:三种陶瓷镶嵌固定的局部义齿设计的抗断裂性。体外比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: The fracture resistance of ceramic inlay-retained fixed partial dentures (CIRFPDs) was studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty CIRFPDs were constructed using ice zircon milled ceramic material. Specimens were divided into three groups, 10 specimens each, according to the abutment preparation: inlay-shaped (occluso-proximal inlay + proximal box), tub-shaped (occluso-proximal inlay), and proximal box-shaped preparations. Each group was then subdivided into two subgroups of five specimens each, according to the span of the edentulous area representing a missing premolar or molar. All specimens were subjected to a fracture resistance test. RESULTS: CIRFPDs with inlay-shaped retainers showed the highest fracture resistance values for missing premolars and molars. CIRFPDs with box-shaped retainers showed lower fracture resistance values. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the three tested CIRFPD designs. There was a statistically significant difference between CIRFPDs constructed for the replacement of molars and those constructed for the replacement of premolars. The CIRFPD constructed for the replacement of molars gave lower fracture resistance values with the three tested designs. All the fracture resistance values obtained in this study were superior to the assumed maximum mastication forces. Failure mode was delamination and chipping of the veneering material. CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistically significant difference between the three designs of CIRPFDs tested. There was a statistically significant difference between CIRFPDs constructed for the replacement of molars than those constructed for the replacement of premolars. The CIRFPDs constructed for the replacement of molars gave lower fracture resistance values with the three tested designs. All fracture resistance values obtained in this study were superior to the assumed maximum mastication forces.
机译:目的:研究了陶瓷镶嵌固位固定义齿(CIRFPDs)的抗断裂性能。材料与方法:用冰锆石磨制的陶瓷材料构建了30个CIRFPD。根据基台准备,将标本分为三组,每组10个标本:嵌体形(咬合近端嵌体+近端盒),盆形(咬合近端嵌体)和近端箱形制剂。然后,根据代表缺失的前磨牙或磨牙的无牙区域的跨度,将每组细分为两个亚组,每组五个标本。所有样品都进行了抗断裂测试。结果:带有镶嵌形固位体的CIRFPDs对于缺失的前磨牙和磨牙显示出最高的抗断裂强度。带有箱形保持架的CIRFPD的抗断裂强度较低。统计分析表明,三种测试的CIRFPD设计之间存在显着差异。为更换磨牙而构建的CIRFPD与为更换前磨牙而构建的CIRFPD之间在统计学上有显着差异。通过三种测试设计,用于置换磨牙的CIRFPD的抗断裂强度较低。在这项研究中获得的所有断裂抗力值均优于假定的最大咀嚼力。失败模式是饰面材料分层和碎裂。结论:三种设计的CIRPFDs之间在统计学上有显着差异。为更换磨牙而建造的CIRFPD与为更换前磨牙而建造的CIRFPD之间在统计学上有显着差异。在三种测试设计中,用于置换磨牙的CIRFPDs的抗断裂强度较低。在这项研究中获得的所有断裂阻力值均优于假定的最大咀嚼力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号