首页> 外文期刊>Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation >Non-invasive contrast enhanced ultrasound for quantitative assessment of tumor microcirculation. Contrast mixed mode examination vs. only contrast enhanced ultrasound examination.
【24h】

Non-invasive contrast enhanced ultrasound for quantitative assessment of tumor microcirculation. Contrast mixed mode examination vs. only contrast enhanced ultrasound examination.

机译:非侵入性对比增强超声用于定量评估肿瘤微循环。对比混合模式检查与仅对比增强超声检查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the different ultrasound techniques for quantification of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in an experimental rat prostate carcinoma model. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Prostate carcinoma (MLLB-2) cells were subcutaneously injected into the right flank of male rat (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany, 180 to 220 g body weight). Following 18 days of subcutaneous tumor growth 9 rats underwent CEUS examination. Real time CEUS was performed after a bolus injection of SonoVue (0.2 ml, Bracco, Italy) via the lateral tail vein using a high end ultrasound system (Siemens Sequoia 512(R)/Acuson, Mountain View) with an 15 Mhz probe. Two different CEUS techniques, pure contrast (pc) and contrast with background (cbg) examination, were analyzed (CPS-software). Exported signal intensity (SI)-time curves and the normalized area under the curve (AUC) for the active tumor tissue, whole tumor and necrosis were compared. RESULTS: The mean normalized AUC for the active tumor tissue and the whole tumor was 0.84 and 0.5 in the pure contrast examination group and 0.49 and 0.3 for the contrast examination with background signal. Therefore the signal intensity of the pc group was in every examination significant higher than of the cbg group (p < 0.02). The advantage of using the additional background information is to detect the anatomic landmarks in the solid tumor model in comparison to the pure contrast enhanced ultrasound examination. CONCLUSION: The complete extension of the tumor is much easier to detect with the cbg technique due to orientation of the anatomic landmarks. As the signal intensity of the pc group is always significant higher we recommend this technique for quantification of contrast enhanced ultrasound, especially for the follow up of tumor microcirculation.
机译:目的:评估在实验性大鼠前列腺癌模型中对比增强超声(CEUS)定量的不同超声技术。方法和材料:将前列腺癌细胞(MLLB-2)皮下注射到雄性大鼠的右胁腹(德国苏尔茨菲尔德的查尔斯河,体重180至220 g)。皮下肿瘤生长18天后,对9只大鼠进行了CEUS检查。使用带有15 Mhz探针的高端超声系统(Siemens Sequoia512®/ Acuson,Mountain View)通过侧尾静脉推注SonoVue(0.2 ml,意大利,Bracco,意大利)后,进行实时CEUS。分析了两种不同的CEUS技术,即纯对比(pc)和背景对比(cbg)检查(CPS软件)。比较了活动肿瘤组织,整个肿瘤和坏死的输出信号强度(SI)-时间曲线和曲线下的标准化面积(AUC)。结果:在纯对比检查组中,活动性肿瘤组织和整个肿瘤的平均标准化AUC分别为0.84和0.5,与背景信号对比检查的平均标准化AUC为0.49和0.3。因此,每次检查中pc组的信号强度均显着高于cbg组(p <0.02)。与纯对比增强超声检查相比,使用附加背景信息的优势在于可检测实体肿瘤模型中的解剖标志。结论:由于解剖标志的方向,使用cbg技术更容易检测到肿瘤的完全扩展。由于pc组的信号强度始终显着较高,因此我们建议使用此技术来定量对比增强超声,尤其是对肿瘤微循环的随访。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号