...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physical therapy science. >Analgesic Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Interferential Current on Experimental Ischemic Pain Models: Frequencies of 50 Hz and 100 Hz
【24h】

Analgesic Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Interferential Current on Experimental Ischemic Pain Models: Frequencies of 50 Hz and 100 Hz

机译:经皮神经电刺激和干扰电流对实验性缺血性疼痛模型的镇痛作用:频率为50 Hz和100 Hz

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

[Purpose] This study compared the analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) on induced ischemic pain in healthy volunteers. [Subjects] The subjects were 36 volunteers (18 male, 18 female) without known pathology that could cause pain. Their mean age was 24.5 +/- 2.2 years. [Methods] A single-blind and parallel-group method was used. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive each 50 Hz TENS, 50 Hz IFC, 100 Hz TENS, and 100 Hz IFC. This study experimentally induced ischemic pain in otherwise pain-free subjects using a modified version of the submaximal effort tourniquet technique. Subjects completed twelve cycles of the ischemic-induced pain test. The primary outcome measure was the change in self-reported of pain intensity during one of four possible treatments. [Results] There were significant effects for Time, which were attributed to a significant reduction in pain intensity for all groups. There were no significant effects for groups or group-time interaction. The 50 Hz IFC treatment was more comfortable than the other treatments in the present study, and it is likely to be better accepted and tolerated by patients. [Conclusion] We conclude that there were no differences in the analgesic effects of the four treatments under the present experimental conditions. The 50 Hz IFC treatment is more comfortable than the other treatments.
机译:[目的]比较健康志愿者中经皮神经电刺激(TENS)和干扰电流(IFC)的镇痛效果。 [受试者]对象为36名志愿者(男18例,女18例),他们不知道可能引起疼痛的病理状况。他们的平均年龄为24.5 +/- 2.2岁。 [方法]采用单盲平行组法。随机分配受试者以分别接收50 Hz TENS,50 Hz IFC,100 Hz TENS和100 Hz IFC。这项研究使用次最大努力止血带技术的改良版本,在原本没有疼痛的受试者中实验性诱导了缺血性疼痛。受试者完成了十二个缺血性疼痛测试周期。主要结果指标是四种可能的治疗方法之一中疼痛强度自我报告的变化。 [结果]时间有显着影响,这归因于所有组的疼痛强度显着降低。对于小组或小组时间互动没有显着影响。 50 Hz IFC治疗比本研究中的其他治疗更舒适,并且可能会被患者更好地接受和耐受。 [结论]我们得出结论,在目前的实验条件下,四种疗法的镇痛效果没有差异。 50 Hz IFC治疗比其他治疗更舒适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号