首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pediatric urology >Reputation rankings for pediatric urology moderately reflect academic productivity
【24h】

Reputation rankings for pediatric urology moderately reflect academic productivity

机译:儿科泌尿科的声誉排名适中反映了学术效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Lloyd et al. [1] presented the Publication Ranking Score (PRS) as an objective measure of hospital “process” quality that differs significantly from US News and World Report (USNWR) hospital rankings. This contrast is important, the authors suggested, because USNWR rankings may “lean heavily on institutional reputation.” The USNWR reputation survey, however, accounts for only 25% of the overall ranking. In this context, Joseph [2] suggested that “the PRS ranking would be better compared to the process domain (reputation) and not the overall final institutional ranking”. Such an analysis is presented below, revealing that the PRS is significantly associated with reputation in the specialty of pediatric urology.
机译:劳埃德等。 [1]提出了出版物排名评分(PRS)作为衡量医院“过程”质量的客观指标,与美国新闻与世界报道(USNWR)医院排名有很大不同。这组作者建议,这种对比很重要,因为USNWR排名可能“严重依赖机构声誉”。但是,USNWR声誉调查仅占整体排名的25%。在这种情况下,Joseph [2]提出“与流程域(声誉)相比,PRS排名要好,而不是整体最终机构排名”。下面进行了这样的分析,表明PRS与小儿泌尿科专业的声誉显着相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号