首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pediatric Surgery: Official Journal of the Surgical Section of the American Academy of Pediatric, the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons, the American Pediatric Surgical Association, and the Canadian Association of Paediatric Surgeons >Results of a longitudinal study of rigorous manuscript submission guidelines designed to improve the quality of clinical research reporting in a peer-reviewed surgical journal.
【24h】

Results of a longitudinal study of rigorous manuscript submission guidelines designed to improve the quality of clinical research reporting in a peer-reviewed surgical journal.

机译:严格的手稿提交指南的纵向研究结果,旨在提高同行评审的外科杂志中临床研究报告的质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In an effort to improve the reporting quality of clinical research, the Journal of Pediatric Surgery instituted specific reporting guidelines for authors beginning June 2006. This study was conducted to evaluate whether these guidelines improved reporting of observational studies. METHODS: The Guidelines for the Reporting of Clinical Research Data (Guidelines) included 23 criteria in 3 subcategories: Methods, Results, and More than one treatment group. Reporting quality was evaluated by determining the percentage of criteria met. Seventy-three articles before implementation and 147 articles after implementation were independently assessed by 2 reviewers. RESULTS: Mean global composite scores increased from 72.2 pre-Guidelines to 80.1 post-Guidelines (P < .0001). Scores increased in each subcategory: Methods, 71.9 to 78.6 (P < .0001); Results, 77.2 to 83.0 (P = .002); and More than one treatment group, 40.0 to 70.6 (P = .0003). Post-Guidelines implementation scores have increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the Guidelines resulted in significant improvement in the quality of reporting in the Journal. The low cost vs the benefit suggests that the Guidelines can be an effective way to improve reporting quality in nonrandomized studies. We encourage further efforts to increase inclusion of reporting criteria as well as evaluation and improvement of the Guidelines. We suggest that editors of other surgical publications consider implementing analogous guidelines.
机译:背景/目的:为了提高临床研究的报告质量,《儿科外科杂志》从2006年6月开始为作者制定了具体的报告指南。本研究旨在评估这些指南是否改善了观察性研究的报告。方法:《临床研究数据报告指南》(指南)在3个子类别中包括23个标准:方法,结果和一个以上治疗组。通过确定符合条件的百分比来评估报告质量。实施前的73条文章和实施后的147条文章由2位审阅者独立评估。结果:全球平均综合评分从指南前的72.2提高到指南后的80.1(P <.0001)。每个子类别的得分都增加:方法,从71.9到78.6(P <.0001);结果为77.2至83.0(P = .002);一个以上的治疗组为40.0至70.6(P = .0003)。指南后实施评分随着时间的推移而增加。结论:《指南》的引入大大改善了《日刊》的报道质量。低成本与利益的关系表明,该指南可以成为提高非随机研究报告质量的有效方法。我们鼓励进一步努力,以增加报告标准的纳入以及对准则的评估和改进。我们建议其他外科出版物的编辑者考虑实施类似的指南。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号