...
【24h】

Comparison of different immunoassays and GC-MS screening of benzodiazepines in urine.

机译:尿液中苯并二氮杂卓的不同免疫分析和GC-MS筛选的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A total of 53 urine samples were tested by different immunoassay methods and by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry to determine repeatability of the different methods and to assess whether the immunoassays performed on samples obtained from elderly patients of the emergency section could be considered as reliable enough for identifying a benzodiazepine consumption. Repeatability was excellent for GC/MS and good for immunoassays. The specificity was not different for the three immunoassays (96%). The sensitivity varied from 36, 64 to 75% for OnLine, RIA Immunalysis and RIA DPC, respectively. An other difference between immunoassays and GC/MS was the ability of GC/MS to detect lorazepam and low concentrations of benzodiazepines whereas immunoassays did not.
机译:通过不同的免疫测定方法和气相色谱/质谱法对总共53个尿液样品进行了测试,以确定不同方法的重复性,并评估对急诊老年患者采集的样品进行的免疫测定是否足够可靠确定苯二氮卓类药物的消费量。 GC / MS的重复性非常好,免疫分析的重复性也很好。三种免疫测定的特异性没有差异(96%)。在线,RIA免疫分析和RIA DPC的灵敏度分别为36%,64%至75%。免疫测定和GC / MS之间的另一个区别是GC / MS检测劳拉西m和低浓度的苯二氮卓类药物的能力,而免疫测定则没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号