首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Petroleum Technology >FOAMED-CEMENT EVALUATION WITH CONVENTIONAL CEMENT LOGS AND IMPROVED INTERPRETATION METHODS
【24h】

FOAMED-CEMENT EVALUATION WITH CONVENTIONAL CEMENT LOGS AND IMPROVED INTERPRETATION METHODS

机译:常规水泥测井的泡沫水泥评价及改进的解释方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Methods used to evaluate conventional cements with logging data may not yield valid results for foamed cements. Logging tools commonly used in cement evaluation are traditional cement-bond-log (CBL) tools and modern ultrasonic scanning tools. CBL took provide waveform images and acoustic amplitudes that describe cement-to-pipe and cement-to-formation bonding. Ultrasonic scanning tools provide circumferential images and detailed information about the cement-to-pipe bond. The major problem in evaluating foamed cements is that their impedance values can be less than those of annular fluids, such as mud or water.
机译:用测井数据评估常规水泥的方法可能无法得出泡沫水泥的有效结果。水泥评估中常用的测井工具是传统的胶结测井(CBL)工具和现代的超声波扫描工具。 CBL提供了描述水泥与管道和水泥与地层结合的波形图和声振幅。超声波扫描工具可提供周向图像以及有关水泥与管道粘结的详细信息。评估泡沫水泥的主要问题是其阻抗值可能小于环状流体(例如泥浆或水)的阻抗值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号