首页> 外文期刊>Journal of oral rehabilitation >To splint or not to splint oral implants in the implant-supported overdenture therapy? A systematic literature review.
【24h】

To splint or not to splint oral implants in the implant-supported overdenture therapy? A systematic literature review.

机译:在支持种植体的义齿治疗中夹住或不夹住口腔植入物?系统的文献综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this systematic review was to assess the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular and maxillary implant-supported overdenture therapy, concerning the implant survival, the peri-implant parameters, the prosthetic complications and the patient satisfaction. An electronic MEDLINE search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies on implant-supported overdentures with a mean follow-up of at least 3 years. Twelve studies from an initial yield of 1022 titles were finally selected and data were extracted. After an observation period of more than 3 years, there was no difference in implant survival rates between splinted and unsplinted design. From most of the investigations included in this study, it was mentioned that the unsplinted design needs more prosthetic maintenance. In more of the studies that were dealing with the satisfaction of the patients wearing implant-supported overdentures, no significant difference in the preference of the patients was reported. No significant difference in the peri-implant outcome between splinted and unsplinted design was found. Within the limits of this systematic review, it is concluded that there was no significant difference between the two different designs of implant-supported overdentures with respect to the soft tissue health status or patient satisfaction, although the bar-supported overdentures have been shown to need less prosthetic maintenance.
机译:这项系统评价的目的是评估在上下颌和上颌种植体支持的覆盖义齿治疗中夹住和未夹住的口腔种植体的影响,涉及种植体存活率,种植体周围参数,假体并发症和患者满意度。进行电子MEDLINE搜索并辅以人工搜索,以鉴定对植入物支持的覆盖义齿的随机临床试验,前瞻性和回顾性队列研究,平均随访时间至少3年。最终从最初的1022个标题中选出了12个研究,并提取了数据。经过3年多的观察期后,夹板和非夹板设计的种植体存活率没有差异。从这项研究中包括的大多数研究中,提到无夹板的设计需要更多的假体维护。在更多有关佩戴植入物支持的覆盖义齿的患者满意度的研究中,没有发现患者偏好方面的显着差异。在夹板式和非夹板式设计之间,植入物周围的预后没有发现显着差异。在本系统评价的范围内,可以得出结论,尽管显示棒支撑的覆盖义齿需要,但两种不同设计的植入物支持覆盖义齿之间在软组织健康状况或患者满意度方面没有显着差异。减少假体维护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号