首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery >A comparison of 3 methods of face-bow transfer recording: implications for orthognathic surgery.
【24h】

A comparison of 3 methods of face-bow transfer recording: implications for orthognathic surgery.

机译:三种面部弓形转移记录方法的比较:对正颌外科手术的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the occlusal plane inclination of models mounted using 3 different systems for face-bow transfer with the actual occlusal plane inclination as measured on a cephalometric radiograph. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two subjects were enrolled in this study. Three alginate impressions of the maxillary dentition were taken, and 3 stone dental models were produced for each subject. Face-bow recordings were obtained on each subject using the SAM Anatomical Face-bow (Great Lakes Orthodontics Products, Ltd, Tonawanda, NY), the Erickson Surgical Face-bow (Great Lakes Orthodontics Products, Ltd) and a new technique developed by one of the authors (J.G.). For each subject, the dental models were mounted on a SAM articulator using each of the 3 face-bow recordings. Finally, a lateral cephalometric radiograph was obtained for each subject. The occlusal plane inclination was measured on the models and on the cephalometric radiographs. Differences among groups were tested using a 1-way analysis of variance. Bonferroni test was used for post hoc comparison between different pairs of groups. RESULTS: The average occlusal plane inclination using the SAM Anatomical Face-bow was 7.8 degrees +/- 4.2 degrees greater than the actual-a difference that was statistically significant. The mean occlusal plane inclination of the models obtained using the Erickson Surgical Face-bow was 4.4 degrees +/- 2.2 degrees greater than the actual-a difference that was also statistically significant. The mean occlusal plane inclination of the models obtained by the new technique was only 0.9 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees greater than the actual; this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The new mounting technique is more accurate than the conventional SAM Face-bow or the Erickson Face-bow for reproducing the actual occlusal plane inclination. Copyright 2001 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较使用3种不同的系统进行面弓转移的模型安装的模型的咬合面倾角与在头颅射线照相术上测得的实际咬合面倾角。患者与方法:22位受试者参与了这项研究。对上颌牙列进行了3次藻酸盐压印,并为每个受试者制作了3个石制牙齿模型。使用SAM解剖面弓(纽约州Tonawanda的Great Lakes口腔正畸产品有限公司),Erickson外科面弓(Great Lakes口腔正畸产品有限公司)以及每个人开发的新技术,获得了每个受试者的脸弓记录。作者(JG)。对于每个受试者,使用3个面部弓形记录中的每一个将牙齿模型安装在SAM咬合架上。最终,为每个受试者获得了一个侧面的头颅射线照相。在模型和头颅X线照片上测量咬合平面的倾斜度。组间差异使用方差单向分析进行检验。 Bonferroni检验用于不同组之间的事后比较。结果:使用SAM解剖面弓的平均咬合面倾斜度比实际值大7.8度+/- 4.2度,差异具有统计学意义。使用Erickson外科手术弓弓获得的模型的平均咬合面倾斜度比实际值大4.4度+/- 2.2度-差异也具有统计学意义。通过新技术获得的模型的平均咬合面倾斜度仅比实际值大0.9度+/- 1.2度。这种差异没有统计学意义。结论:新的安装技术比传统的SAM面弓或Erickson面弓更精确,可再现实际的咬合面倾斜度。版权所有2001美国口腔颌面外科医师协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号