...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy >A statistical study of the analysis of congested spectra by total spectrum fitting
【24h】

A statistical study of the analysis of congested spectra by total spectrum fitting

机译:全谱拟合分析拥塞谱的统计研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Heavily overlapped, or congested spectra often display much structure but few individual "lines." Methods have been devised for analyzing such spectra through nonlinear least-squares fitting of the intensity as a function of wavelength or wave-number. Such total spectrum fitting (TSF) methods are examined statistically for a simple diatomic model and compared with the standard "measure-assign-fit" (MAF) approach in use since the dawn of spectroscopy. Monte Carlo computations on typically 1000 synthetic spectra at a time verify that the predictions of the variance-covariance matrix are reliable under many circumstances. However in regions where the P and R branches double up, the predicted standard errors in the key spectroscopic constants rise sharply and greatly exceed estimates from the Monte Carlo ensemble statistics. In the same regions, the MAF method actually gives better precision. However, for imperfectly overlapped R and P branches, the MAF standard errors are typically three times larger than the TSF values; moreover, the MAF statistical errors are dwarfed by bias. The TSF approach, while clearly superior in these tests, has a practical drawback: it, too, can give significant bias if the spectra are analyzed with an incorrect model, as illustrated here through calculations employing the wrong function to describe the spectral lineshape. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:大量重叠或拥挤的光谱通常显示出很多结构,但个别“线条”却很少。已经设计了用于通过强度的非线性最小二乘拟合来分析这种光谱的方法,所述强度作为波长或波数的函数。对这种总光谱拟合(TSF)方法进行了统计分析,以建立一个简单的双原子模型,并将其与自光谱学问世以来使用的标准“测量-分配-拟合”(MAF)方法进行了比较。一次通常对1000个合成光谱进行的蒙特卡洛计算验证了方差-协方差矩阵的预测在许多情况下都是可靠的。但是,在P和R分支加倍的区域中,关键光谱常数的预测标准误差急剧上升,大大超过了蒙特卡洛系综统计的估计值。在相同区域中,MAF方法实际上可以提供更好的精度。但是,对于不完全重叠的R和P分支,MAF标准误差通常比TSF值大三倍;此外,MAF统计误差因偏见而相形见.。 TSF方法虽然在这些测试中明显优于其他方法,但存在一个实际缺点:如果使用错误的模型分析光谱,它也会产生明显的偏差,如此处通过使用错误函数描述光谱线形的计算所示。 (C)2004 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号