首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine >Reliability of the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment and commentary.
【24h】

Reliability of the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment and commentary.

机译:AMA的可靠性指导评估永久性损伤和评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We, the leadership of the American Academy of Disability Evaluating Physicians (AADEP) read with interest the article by Forst et al and the subsequent commentary by Rondinelli2 titled "Reliability of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment" (J Occup Environ Med.2010;52:1201-1205).We would like to point out an error on page 1204 in Dr Rondinelli's commentary wherein he writes "A number of educational venues are available to afford opportunity for physicians to gain the necessary knowledge and expertise to perform ratings correctly (see, for example, courses8-9 and certifications8 offered regularly to physician raters); such courses typically require several days of intensive didactics and pre-course preparation as well as some operating familiarity with the AMA Guides to complete the training course with optimal proficiency."
机译:我们美国残疾人评估医师学会(AADEP)的领导感兴趣地阅读了Forst等人的文章以及随后的Rondinelli2的评论,题为“ AMA对永久性损伤评估指南的可靠性”(J Occup Environ Med。 2010; 52:1201-1205)。我们想指出Rondinelli博士评论中第1204页的错误,他在评论中写道:“有许多教育场所可供医师提供机会,以获取必要的知识和专业知识来进行评分正确(例如,定期向医师评分者提供课程8-9和认证8);此类课程通常需要几天的密集教学和课前准备,以及对AMA指南的一些操作熟悉,才能以最佳方式完成培训课程熟练程度。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号