...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical psychology review >Spanking, corporal punishment and negative long-term outcomes: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies
【24h】

Spanking, corporal punishment and negative long-term outcomes: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies

机译:打屁股,体罚和长期负面结果:纵向研究的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Social scientists continue to debate the impact of spanking and corporal punishment (CP) on negative child outcomes including externalizing and internalizing behavior problems and cognitive performance. Previous meta-analytic reviews have mixed long- and short-term studies and relied on bivariate r, which may inflate effect sizes. The current meta-analysis focused on longitudinal studies, and compared effects using bivariate r and better controlled partial r coefficients controlling for time-1 outcome variables. Consistent with previous findings, results based on bivariate r found small but non-trivial long-term relationships between spanking/CP use and negative outcomes. Spanking and CP correlated .14 and .18 respectively with externalizing problems, .12 and .21 with internalizing problems and - .09 and - .18 with cognitive performance. However, when better controlled partial r coefficients (pr) were examined, results were statistically significant but trivial (at or below pr=10) for externalizing (.07 for spanking, .08 for CP) and internalizing behaviors (.10 for spanking, insufficient studies for CP) and near the threshold of trivial for cognitive performance (- .11 for CP, insufficient studies for spanking). It is concluded that the impact of spanking and CP on the negative outcomes evaluated here (externalizing, internalizing behaviors and low cognitive performance) are minimal. It is advised that psychologists take a more nuanced approach in discussing the effects of spanking/CP with the general public, consistent with the size as well as the significance of their longitudinal associations with adverse outcomes.
机译:社会科学家继续争论打屁股和体罚(CP)对儿童负面结果的影响,包括外部和内部化行为问题和认知表现。先前的荟萃分析评论混合了长期和短期研究,并依赖于双变量r,这可能会增加效应量。当前的荟萃分析侧重于纵向研究,并比较了使用双变量r和控制时间-1结果变量的更好控制的部分r系数的效果。与先前的研究结果一致,基于双变量r的结果发现,打屁股/ CP使用与否定结局之间的长期关系不大,但并非不重要。打屁股和CP分别使.14和.18与外部化问题相关,.12和.21与内部化问题相关,以及-.09和-.18与认知能力相关。但是,当检查更好地控制的局部r系数(pr)时,结果具有统计学意义,但对于外部化(打屁股为0.07,CP为0.08)和内部化行为(打屁股为.10,对CP的研究不足),并且对认知表现无足轻重(对CP而言为-.11,对于打屁股的研究不足)。结论是,打屁股和CP对此处评估的负面结果(外部化,内部化行为和低认知能力)的影响最小。建议心理学家在与公众讨论打屁股/ CP的效果时采取更细微的方法,这与其纵向关联与不良后果的大小以及重要性相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号