首页> 外文期刊>CNS drugs >Prescription privileges for psychologists: a comprehensive review and critical analysis of current issues and controversies.
【24h】

Prescription privileges for psychologists: a comprehensive review and critical analysis of current issues and controversies.

机译:心理医生的处方特权:对当前问题和争议的全面审查和批判性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The debate over whether clinical psychologists should be granted the right to prescribe psychoactive medications has received considerable attention over the past 2 decades in North America and, more recently, in the UK. Proponents of granting prescription privileges to clinical psychologists argue that mental healthcare services are in crisis and that the mental health needs of society are not being met. They attribute this crisis primarily to the inappropriate prescribing practices of general practitioners and a persistent shortage of psychiatrists. It is believed that, as they would increase the scope of the practice of psychology, prescription privileges for psychologists would enhance mental health services by increasing public access to qualified professionals who are able to prescribe. The profession of psychology remains divided on the issue, and opponents have been equally outspoken in their arguments. The purpose of the present article is to place the pursuit of prescription privileges for psychologists in context by discussing the historical antecedents and major forces driving the debate. The major arguments put forth for and against prescription privileges for psychologists are presented, followed by a critical analysis of the validity and coherence of those arguments. Through this analysis, the following question is addressed. Is there currently sufficient empirical support for the desirability, feasibility, safety and cost effectiveness of granting prescription privileges to psychologists? Although proponents of granting prescription privileges to psychologists present several compelling arguments in favour of this practice, there remains a consistent lack of empirical evidence for the desirability, feasibility, safety and cost effectiveness of this proposal. More research is needed before we can conclude that prescription privileges for psychologists are a safe and logical solution to the problems facing the mental healthcare system.
机译:在过去的20年中,有关临床心理学家是否应有权开具精神活性药物的争论在北美和最近的英国引起了相当大的关注。向临床心理学家授予处方特权的支持者认为,精神保健服务正处于危机之中,社会的精神保健需求未能得到满足。他们将这次危机归因于全科医生的不适当开处方做法和精神病医生的持续短缺。人们认为,由于心理学家的处方特权会增加心理学实践的范围,因此它们将通过增加公众对有资格进行处方的合格专业人员的访问,从而改善心理健康服务。心理学界在这个问题上分歧很大,反对者的论点也同样直言不讳。本文的目的是通过讨论推动辩论的历史前因和主要力量,为心理学家提供对处方特权的追求。介绍了支持和反对心理学家开处方特权的主要论点,然后对这些论点的有效性和连贯性进行了批判性分析。通过该分析,解决了以下问题。对于向心理学家授予处方特权的可取性,可行性,安全性和成本效益,目前是否有足够的经验支持?尽管向心理学家授予处方特权的支持者提出了一些令人信服的论据来支持这种做法,但始终缺乏关于该提议的可取性,可行性,安全性和成本效益的经验证据。在我们可以得出结论,心理学家的处方特权是对精神保健系统所面临问题的安全和逻辑解决方案之前,需要进行更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号