...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of nuclear cardiology: official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology >Comparison of attenuation, dual-energy-window, and model-based scatter correction of low-count SPECT to 82Rb PET/CT quantified myocardial perfusion scores
【24h】

Comparison of attenuation, dual-energy-window, and model-based scatter correction of low-count SPECT to 82Rb PET/CT quantified myocardial perfusion scores

机译:低计数SPECT与82Rb PET / CT定量心肌灌注评分的衰减,双能窗口和基于模型的散射校正的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: New reconstruction algorithms allow reduction in acquisition times or the amount of injected radioactivity. We examined the impact of different corrections on low-count clinical SPECT myocardial perfusion images (MPI) and compared to 82Rb PET/CT. We compared no corrections (NC) to attenuation correction (AC) with and without scatter correction by either a dual-energy-window (AC-DEW) or model-based (AC-ESSE) approach. All reconstructions included resolution recovery. Methods: 56 Patients were imaged using a standard rest/stress Tc-99m-tetrofosmin MPI SPECT/CT protocol with an additional half-time acquisition. A 82Rb-rest/stress PET/CT MPI was acquired within 4 weeks. Reconstruction methods were compared using summed rest/stress/difference scores from an objective algorithm (SRS/SSS/SDS). Results: The SRS and SSS for NC were significantly (P .01) higher than for AC, but well correlated (r ≥ 0.87). The correlation in SRS/SSS among AC, AC-DEW, and AC-ESSE was excellent (r ≥ 0.98). AC-ESSE and AC-DEW had higher SRS (P ≤.05) than AC, but the SDS values were not significantly different. Concordance with PET normal/abnormal classification was 76% for NC and ≥85% for the AC methods. Conclusion: AC significantly improves the accuracy of low-count myocardial perfusion SPECT half-time imaging for the detection of disease compared to NC. Compared to PET, there was no significant difference among AC, AC-DEW, and AC-ESSE.
机译:背景:新的重建算法可以缩短采集时间或减少注入的放射性。我们检查了不同校正对低计数临床SPECT心肌灌注图像(MPI)的影响,并与82Rb PET / CT进行了比较。我们通过双能量窗口(AC-DEW)或基于模型(AC-ESSE)的方法将有无散射校正的校正(NC)与衰减校正(AC)进行了比较。所有重建都包括分辨率恢复。方法:使用标准的静息/应激Tc-99m-四氟膦MPI SPECT / CT协议对56例患者进行成像,并进行半场采集。在4周内获得了82Rb静息/压力PET / CT MPI。使用来自目标算法(SRS / SSS / SDS)的休息/压力/差异得分总和来比较重建方法。结果:NC的SRS和SSS显着(P <.01)高于AC,但相关性很好(r≥0.87)。 AC,AC-DEW和AC-ESSE之间的SRS / SSS相关性极好(r≥0.98)。 AC-ESSE和AC-DEW的SRS(P≤.05)比AC高,但SDS值没有显着差异。 NC方法与PET正常/异常分类的一致性为76%,AC方法为≥85%。结论:与NC相比,AC显着提高了低计数心肌灌注SPECT半时成像在疾病检测中的准确性。与PET相比,AC,AC-DEW和AC-ESSE之间没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号