...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of midwifery & women's health >Outcomes of Latina women in centeringpregnancy group prenatal care compared with individual prenatal care
【24h】

Outcomes of Latina women in centeringpregnancy group prenatal care compared with individual prenatal care

机译:中心妊娠组产前护理与个人产前护理相比的拉丁裔女性结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: CenteringPregnancy is a client-centered model of group prenatal care that brings women together into small groups to receive care through assessment, education, and support. As Spanish-speaking CenteringPregnancy groups become more common, outcomes of Latinas who attend these groups must be assessed. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare pregnancy outcomes of Latina women who completed CenteringPregnancy in a public health clinic with women who completed individual care in the same clinic during the same time. Methods: Medical charts were reviewed retrospectively to examine differences in pregnancy outcomes and maternal factors in both prenatal care groups. Latina Spanish-speaking women who completed CenteringPregnancy were matched with Latina Spanish-speaking women who completed individual care within the same time frame. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine maternal and birth outcomes. Results: A total of 487 patient charts were obtained for data collection (CenteringPregnancy n = 247, individual n = 240). No differences in low-birth-weight or preterm births were observed between the groups. Compared with women in individual care, women in CenteringPregnancy had higher odds of giving birth vaginally (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-5.36), attending prenatal care visits (aOR, 11.03; 95% CI, 4.53-26.83), attending postpartum care visits (aOR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.20-4.05), and feeding their infants formula only (aOR, 6.07; 95% CI, 2.57-14.3). Women in CenteringPregnancy also had lower odds of gaining below the recommended amount of gestational weight (aOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.78). Discussion: Women in CenteringPregnancy had higher health care utilization, but there were no differences in preterm birth or low birth weight. Randomized studies are needed to eliminate selection bias.
机译:简介:CenteringPregnancy是一个以客户为中心的团体产前护理模型,它将妇女聚在一起,通过评估,教育和支持接受护理。随着以西班牙语为中心的怀孕组变得越来越普遍,必须评估参加这些组的拉丁裔的结局。这项回顾性队列研究的目的是比较在公共卫生诊所完成CenteringPregnancy的拉丁裔妇女与在同一时间在同一诊所完成个人护理的妇女的妊娠结局。方法:回顾性检查病历,以检查两个产前护理组的妊娠结局和孕产妇因素的差异。完成了CenteringPregnancy的讲西班牙语的拉丁裔女性与在同一时间范围内完成个人护理的讲西班牙语的拉丁裔女性相匹配。进行逻辑回归分析以检查孕产妇和分娩结局。结果:总共获得了487位患者图表用于数据收集(CenteringPregnancy n = 247,个人n = 240)。两组之间在低出生体重或早产方面没有差异。与单独护理的妇女相比,居中妊娠妇女阴道分娩的可能性更高(调整后的优势比[aOR]为2.57; 95%的置信区间[CI]为1.23-5.36),参加了产前检查(aOR为11.03; 95)百分比CI,4.53-26.83),参加产后护理就诊(aOR,2.20; 95%CI,1.20-1.05),仅喂养婴儿配方奶粉(aOR,6.07; 95%CI,2.57-14.3)。处于居中妊娠状态的妇女的妊娠几率也低于建议的妊娠体重(aOR,0.41; 95%CI,0.22-0.78)。讨论:处于居中妊娠的妇女对卫生保健的利用较高,但早产或低出生体重没有差异。需要进行随机研究以消除选择偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号