首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Operative laparoscopy revisited.
【24h】

Operative laparoscopy revisited.

机译:再次进行腹腔镜手术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 1992, Dr. Roy Pitkin, the editor of Obstetrics & Gyne-cology, wrote an editorial entitled "Operative Laparoscopy: Surgical Advance or Technical Gimmick?" [1]. In the text, he posed 5 related questions. The first had to do with technical feasibility vs therapeutic appropriateness. This question can be best answered by randomized clinical studies with comparison to what was at the time the standard of care, namely, laparotomy. However, speaking from personal experience, it was not easy in the early days to have one's research efforts in this area published. The negative bias of the academic community toward laparoscopy and its proponents was intense. We were called "cowboys," a derogatory term then but perhaps less so now. I would rather be a cowboy than an investment banker; the pay is less but the public image is better.
机译:1992年,妇产科的编辑Roy Pitkin博士撰写了一篇社论,标题为“手术腹腔镜:外科手术还是技术mm头?” [1]。在文本中,他提出了5个相关问题。第一个与技术可行性与治疗适用性有关。与当时的护理标准(即剖腹手术)相比,可以通过随机临床研究来最好地回答这个问题。然而,从个人经验上讲,在早期阶段发表有关这一领域的研究成果并不容易。学术界对腹腔镜检查及其支持者的强烈偏见。我们当时被称为“牛仔”,这是一个贬义词,但现在也许已经不那么贬义了。我宁愿当牛仔,也不愿当投资银行家。薪水少,但公众形象好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号