...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurotrauma >Methodology of systematic reviews and recommendations.
【24h】

Methodology of systematic reviews and recommendations.

机译:系统评价和建议的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although research in the field of spinal cord injury (SCI) is a relatively new endeavor, a remarkable number of papers focused on this subspecialty have been published in a broad variety of journals over the last two decades. A multidisciplinary group of experts, including clinical epidemiologists, neurosurgical and orthopedic spine surgeons, basic scientists, rehabilitation specialists, intensivists, and allied health professionals (nursing and physical therapy) was assembled through the Spinal Cord Injury Solutions Network to summarize the existing literature focusing on 12 key topics related to acute traumatic SCI, which have not been recently reviewed. The objective was to develop evidence-based recommendations to help translate current science into clinical practice and to identify new directions for research. For each topic one to three specific questions were formulated by consensus through the expert panel. A systematic review of the literature was performed to determine the current evidence for the specific questions. A primary literature search was performed using MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. A secondary search strategy incorporated additional articles referenced in significant publications (i.e., meta-analysis, systematic and nonsystematic review articles). Two reviewers independently reviewed the titles and abstracts yielded by this comprehensive search and subsequently selected articles based on the predetermined inclusion and inclusion criteria. Data were extracted for population into evidentiary tables. Selected articles were rated for level of evidence and methodological quality, information that was also included in evidentiary tables. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer or consensus-based discussion. Based on the evidence compiled, answers to the targeted questions were formulated and recommendations generated by consensus-based discussion and anonymized voting using Delphi methodology. A level of consensus of 80% or higher was considered to represent strong agreement.
机译:尽管在脊髓损伤(SCI)领域的研究是一个相对较新的尝试,但是在过去的二十年中,针对这一亚专业的大量论文已经发表在各种各样的期刊上。通过脊髓损伤解决方案网络,由临床流行病学家,神经外科和骨科脊柱外科医生,基础科学家,康复专家,强化医生和专职医疗人员(护理和物理治疗)组成的多学科专家小组总结了现有文献,重点关注与急性创伤性脊髓损伤有关的12个关键主题,最近尚未进行审查。目的是制定基于证据的建议,以帮助将当前的科学转化为临床实践并确定新的研究方向。通过专家小组协商一致,针对每个主题提出了1-3个具体问题。对文献进行了系统的回顾,以确定针对特定问题的当前证据。使用MEDLINE,CINAHL,EMBASE和Cochrane数据库进行了文献检索。二级搜索策略结合了重要出版物中引用的其他文章(即,荟萃分析,系统和非系统的评论文章)。两位审稿人独立审查了这种全面搜索产生的标题和摘要,随后根据预定的收录和收录标准选择了文章。提取人口数据到证据表中。对所选文章的证据水平和方法学质量进行了评级,这些信息也包括在证据表中。分歧由第三位审稿人或基于共识的讨论解决。根据收集的证据,针对目标问题制定答案,并通过基于共识的讨论和使用Delphi方法进行的匿名投票产生建议。 80%或更高的共识水平被认为是强有力的共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号