...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral implants research >Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems
【24h】

Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems

机译:下颌单种植体覆盖义齿:一项随机对照试验的初步结果,该实验涉及不同种植体直径和附着系统的早期负荷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To determine surgical and prosthodontic outcomes of mandibular single-implant overdentures, opposing complete maxillary dentures, using a wide diameter implant and large ball attachment system compared with different regular diameter implants with standard attachment systems. Materials and methods: Thirty-six edentulous participants (mean age 68 years, SD 9.2) were randomly assigned into three treatment groups (n= 12). A single implant was placed in the mandibular midline of participants to support an overdenture using a 6-week loading protocol. The control group received Southern regular implants and standard ball attachments. One group received Southern 8-mm-wide implants and large ball attachments. Another group received Neoss regular implants and Locator attachments. Parametric and non-parametric tests of a statistical software package (SPSS) were used to determine between groups differences in marginal bone loss, implant stability, implant, and prosthodontic success (P<0.05). Results: Implant success after 1 year was 75% for Southern regular implant (control) group; and 100% for the Southern wide and Neoss regular implant groups (P= 0.038). Mean marginal bone loss at 1 year was 0.19 mm (SD 0.39) without significant differences observed. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) at baseline was significantly lower for the Southern regular (control) group than the other two groups (P=0.001; P= 0.009). At 1 year, no significant difference in implant stability was observed (mean ISQ 74.6, SD 6.1). The change in implant stability from baseline to 1 year was significant for the control group (P= 0.025). Prosthodontic success was comparable between the groups but the maintenance (41 events overall, mean 1.2) was greater for the Locator and the standard ball attachments. Conclusions: Mandibular single-implant overdentures are a successful treatment option for older edentulous adults with early loading protocol using implants of different diameters and with differ...
机译:目的:与采用标准附件系统的不同常规直径植入物相比,使用大直径植入物和大球附着系统来确定下颌单一植入物覆盖义齿(相对于完整的上颌义齿)的手术和修复效果。材料和方法:36位无牙颌参与者(平均年龄68岁,SD 9.2)被随机分为三个治疗组(n = 12)。将单个植入物放置在参与者的下颌中线,以使用6周的加载方案支持覆盖义齿。对照组接受南方常规植入物和标准球附件。一组接受了南部8毫米宽的植入物和大型球形附件。另一个小组接受了Neoss常规植入物和Locator附件。使用统计软件包(SPSS)进行参数和非参数测试来确定各组之间的边际骨丢失,植入物稳定性,植入物和修复成功与否之间的差异(P <0.05)。结果:Southern常规种植(对照组)1年后的种植成功率为75%; Southern常规和Neoss常规种植组为100%(P = 0.038)。 1年时的平均边缘骨丢失量为0.19 mm(SD 0.39),未观察到显着差异。 Southern常规组(对照组)的基线种植稳定商(ISQ)显着低于其他两组(P = 0.001; P = 0.009)。在1年时,没有观察到植入物稳定性的显着差异(平均ISQ 74.6,SD 6.1)。对照组从基线到1年植入物稳定性的变化是显着的(P = 0.025)。假牙修复的成功率在两组之间可比,但定位器和标准球附件的维护(总共41次,平均1.2次)更大。结论:下颌单种植体覆盖义齿是具有早期负荷方案,使用不同直径和不同直径种植体的早期无牙颌成年成年人的成功治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号