首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oncology >Predictive Factors for Well-being in Advanced Cancer Patients Referred for Palliative Radiotherapy
【24h】

Predictive Factors for Well-being in Advanced Cancer Patients Referred for Palliative Radiotherapy

机译:接受姑息放疗的晚期癌症患者幸福感的预测因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim: Well-being falls within a broad category of quality of life indicators and encompasses both physical and emotional factors. Identification of the most important factors affecting overall well-being may allow health care practitioners to target these symptoms and improve patients' quality of life. The purpose of this study was to determine factors most predictive of well-being in advanced cancer patients. Materials and methods: Patients referred to the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at consultation. ESAS scores and demographics were analysed for their predictive ability for well-being via regression analysis of the raw and categorical scores. Results: In total, 1439 ESAS assessments were analysed; the median age was 69 years (range 21-95). The most common primary cancers were of the lung (36%), breast (21%) and prostate (18%). Greater distress in all ESAS items, lower Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and referral for bone metastases significantly predicted for worse well-being (all . P < 0.0001). However, referral for brain metastases predicted for better well-being. In multivariate analysis, the most predictive factors for worse well-being were lower KPS (. P = 0.003) and greater distress in drowsiness (. P = 0.01), pain (. P < 0.0001), fatigue (. P < 0.0001), depression (. P < 0.0001) and appetite loss (. P < 0.0001). Repeated analyses with categorical scores led to similar results. Conclusion: Greater distress in physical and emotional symptoms assessed by ESAS contributes significantly to poorer well-being. Management for patients with advanced cancer should be directed towards these symptoms, as they form the basis for well-being. Although emotional symptoms may be scored lower than physical symptoms by patients, both significantly affect well-being.
机译:目的:幸福感属于生活质量指标的广义范畴,涵盖身体和情感因素。确定影响整体健康的最重要因素可能使医疗保健从业人员能够针对这些症状并改善患者的生活质量。这项研究的目的是确定最能预测晚期癌症患者幸福感的因素。材料和方法:转诊至快速反应放射治疗计划的患者在咨询时完成了埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(ESAS)。通过对原始和分类得分的回归分析,分析了ESAS得分和人口统计学对幸福感的预测能力。结果:总共分析了1439次ESAS评估;中位年龄为69岁(范围为21-95)。最常见的原发癌是肺癌(36%),乳腺癌(21%)和前列腺癌(18%)。在所有ESAS项目中,更大的困扰,更低的Karnofsky绩效状态(KPS)以及转诊骨转移显着预示了更差的幸福感(所有P <0.0001)。然而,转介脑转移预示着更好的健康。在多变量分析中,最糟糕的幸福感预测因素是KPS较低(。P = 0.003)和嗜睡困扰(。P = 0.01),疼痛(。P <0.0001),疲劳(。P <0.0001),抑郁(。P <0.0001)和食欲不振(。P <0.0001)。重复使用分类评分的分析得出相似的结果。结论:通过ESAS评估,身体和情绪症状的更大困扰极大地导致了幸福感的下降。晚期癌症患者的治疗应针对这些症状,因为它们构成了幸福的基础。尽管患者可能将情绪症状的评分低于身体症状,但两者都会显着影响幸福感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号