...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral implants research >Survival and complications of computer aided-designing and computer-aided manufacturing vs. conventionally fabricated implant-supported reconstructions: a systematic review.
【24h】

Survival and complications of computer aided-designing and computer-aided manufacturing vs. conventionally fabricated implant-supported reconstructions: a systematic review.

机译:计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造与传统制造的植入物支持的重建术的生存和并发症:系统综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the internationally published survival and complication rates of implant-supported computer-aided designing (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)-fabricated restorations and to compare them with those of conventionally fabricated implant-supported restorations. METHODS: An electronic MEDLINE search was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies on CAD-CAM fabricated implant-supported restorations with a mean follow-up time of at least 1 year. Failure and complication rates were evaluated and descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: An electronic MEDLINE search revealed four studies reporting on implant-supported CAD-CAM fabricated restorations. The cumulative 5-year survival rate of implants supporting full-arch-fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) ranged from 81.4% to 95.6%. Reported survival rates of implants supporting all-ceramic single crowns (SCs) were 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 92.4-100]. The cumulative 5-year survival rate for full-arch FDPs ranged from 72.2% to 100%. Reported cumulative 5-year survival rates for all-ceramic SCs were 100% (95% CI: 92.4-100%). Technical complications were reported in two of the four selected studies and the estimated annual failure rate for chipping/fracture of the veneering material was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.06-3.06) for implant-supported all-ceramic SCs and 3.61 (95% CI: 2.05-6.36) for implant-supported FDPs. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small number of clinical studies reporting on implant-supported CAD-CAM fabricated restorations exists which makes a scientifically valid comparison with conventionally fabricated restorations impossible.
机译:目的:本系统综述的目的是评估国际上发表的植入物支持的计算机辅助设计(CAD)和计算机辅助制造(CAM)制备的修复体的生存率和并发症发生率,并将其与常规制备的植入物进行比较支持的修复。方法:进行电子MEDLINE搜索,以鉴定对CAD-CAM制造的植入物支持的修复物的前瞻性和回顾性队列研究,平均随访时间至少为1年。评估失败率和并发症发生率,并进行描述性统计。结果:电子MEDLINE搜索显示四项研究报告了种植体支持的CAD-CAM制成的修复体。支持全牙弓固定假牙(FDP)的植入物的5年累积生存率在81.4%至95.6%之间。报告的支持全陶瓷单冠(SCs)的植入物生存率为100%[95%置信区间(CI):92.4-100]。全拱门FDP的5年累积生存率在72.2%至100%之间。报告的全陶瓷SC的5年累积生存率为100%(95%CI:92.4-100%)。在四项选定研究中的两项中报告了技术并发症,植入物支持的全陶瓷SC的饰面材料崩裂/断裂的年故障率估计为0.43(95%CI:0.06-3.06),3.61(95%CI) :2.05-6.36),用于植入物支持的FDP。结论:仅有少数临床报告报道了植入物支持的CAD-CAM人造修复体,这使得与常规人造修复体进行科学有效的比较成为不可能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号