...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology >Hysterectomy controversies: Ovarian and cervical preservation
【24h】

Hysterectomy controversies: Ovarian and cervical preservation

机译:子宫切除术的争议:卵巢和宫颈的保存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The decision to retain or remove the ovaries and cervix at the time of hysterectomy is complex and controversial. We present a summary of the current literature on the risks and benefits of elective oophorectomy and subtotal hysterectomy to inform surgical decision making. There are no randomized trials of oophorectomy compared with hysterectomy and ovarian preservation. Observational studies have conflicting evidence on long-term health outcomes following oophorectomy. In contrast, there are high-quality randomized trials of subtotal versus total hysterectomy; there is a decrease in some short-term surgical complications for women who undergo subtotal hysterectomy, but no differences in long-term outcomes.
机译:子宫切除时保留或去除卵巢和子宫颈的决定是复杂且有争议的。我们提供了有关选择性行卵切除术和次全子宫切除术的风险和益处的最新文献的摘要,以为外科手术决策提供依据。没有将卵巢切除术与子宫切除术和卵巢保存术比较的随机试验。观察性研究在卵巢切除术后长期健康结局方面有相互矛盾的证据。相比之下,有一些高质量的关于小子宫切除术和全子宫切除术的随机试验。子宫全切除术的女性短期手术并发症有所减少,但长期结局无差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号