首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Virology >Neutralizing antibodies to interferon-α and circulating interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C non-responding to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin re-treated by pegylated interferon-α-2a and ribavirin (ANRS HC16 GAMMATRI substudy)
【24h】

Neutralizing antibodies to interferon-α and circulating interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C non-responding to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin re-treated by pegylated interferon-α-2a and ribavirin (ANRS HC16 GAMMATRI substudy)

机译:聚乙二醇化干扰素-α-2a和利巴韦林重新治疗的对聚乙二醇化干扰素加利巴韦林无反应的慢性丙型肝炎患者中抗干扰素-α和循环干扰素的抗体(ANRS HC16 GAMMATRI子研究)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A lack of antiviral response in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with pegylated (PEG)-interferon (IFN)-α-2a+ribavirin (RIBA) may be explained by neutralizing antibodies to IFN-α-2a. The aim of this study was to assess neutralizing antibodies to IFN-α-2a and IFN levels in non-responder patients who were re-treated by PEG IFN-α-2a and RIBA for 12 weeks. Non-responders to a first-line treatment of PEG IFN-α-2a+RIBA were included for treatment with PEG IFN-α-2a (180μg/week)+RIBA (1,000mg/day if 75kg, 1,200mg otherwise) for 48 weeks. HCV RNA was measured at week 12. IFN levels and neutralizing antibodies to IFN-α-2a were measured retrospectively on stored sera at baseline and weeks 4 and 12, using a quantitative sandwich ELISA for neutralizing antibodies to IFN-α-2a. Twenty-three patients were non-responders and 19 patients were responders at week 12 of the initial phase of the second-line treatment. Non-responders and responders did not differ statistically: baseline age (median age 47 vs. 50 years), HCV RNA (median 6.8 vs. 6.4 log 10 copies/ml), gender (70% vs. 73% males), genotype (genotype 1: 91% vs. 80%). The median IFN-α-2a levels (pg/ml) at weeks 0, 4, and 12 (interquartile range) did not differ between the 19 responders to initial phase of second-line treatment and the 23 non-responders: 3.3 (3.3-371.4), 1457.3 (106.8-3284.8), and 1,652 (90.8-5,000); 84.5 (3.3-277.4), 1407.4 (120.2-2443.4), and 1620.1 (120.2-2287.1), respectively. Among non-selected consecutive non-responder patients, re-treatment with PEG IFN-α-2a+ RIBA is associated with virological response regardless of the presence of antibody-mediated resistance to conventional IFN treatment. J. Med. Virol. 82:2027-2031, 2010.
机译:用聚乙二醇化(PEG)-干扰素(IFN)-α-2a+利巴韦林(RIBA)治疗的慢性丙型肝炎患者缺乏抗病毒反应可以通过中和IFN-α-2a抗体来解释。这项研究的目的是评估经PEGIFN-α-2a和RIBA治疗12周的非应答患者中抗IFN-α-2a和IFN水平的中和抗体。一线治疗PEGIFN-α-2a+ RIBA的无反应者包括PEGIFN-α-2a(180μg/周)+ RIBA(如果小于75kg,则为1,000mg /天,否则为1,200mg)进行治疗48周。在第12周测量HCV RNA,使用定量三明治ELISA法中和IFN-α-2a的抗体,在基线,第4周和第12周时对储存的血清中的IFN水平和针对IFN-α-2a的中和抗体进行回顾性测量。在二线治疗初始阶段的第12周时,有23例患者无反应,有19例患者为反应者。无反应者和有反应者在统计学上没有差异:基线年龄(中位年龄47 vs. 50岁),HCV RNA(中位数6.8对6.4 log 10个拷贝/ ml),性别(男性分别为70%和73%),基因型基因型1:91%和80%)。在二线治疗初始阶段的19位缓解者和23位无反应者之间,第0、4和12周(四分位间距)的IFN-α-2a中位水平(pg / ml)没有差异。 <3.3-371.4),1457.3(106.8-3284.8)和1,652(90.8-5,000); 84.5(3.3-277.4),1407.4(120.2-2443.4)和1620.1(120.2-2287.1)。在未选择的连续无应答患者中,用PEGIFN-α-2a+ RIBA进行再治疗与病毒学应答相关,而与抗体介导的对常规IFN治疗的抗药性无关。 J. Med。病毒。 82:2027-2031,2010。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号