首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Perfusion abnormalities in pulmonary embolism studied with perfusion MRI and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy: an intra-modality and inter-modality agreement study.
【24h】

Perfusion abnormalities in pulmonary embolism studied with perfusion MRI and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy: an intra-modality and inter-modality agreement study.

机译:通过灌注MRI和通气-灌注显像技术研究肺动脉栓塞的灌注异常:模态内和模态间一致性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy (V-P scan) in the study of perfusion abnormalities in pulmonary embolism (PE) and to compare the PE results to the findings previously reported for pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in terms of perfusion abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images and V-P scans of 20 patients with PE, 11 patients with acute pneumonia, and 13 patients with exacerbation of COPD were studied. Five categories of perfusion abnormalities within each imaging modality were defined. Intra- and inter-modality agreement (kappa values) in the evaluation of perfusion abnormalities were calculated, based on the two observers of each imaging modality (all blinded to each other and true diagnosis). Finally, three categories of perfusion MRI diagnosis (PE, pneumonia, and COPD) were also defined and the inter-observer agreement (kappa value) was calculated. RESULTS: For PE, the intra-modality agreement (kappa value) in the evaluation of perfusion abnormalities was 0.77 for MRI and 0.65 for V-P scan. The inter-modality agreement varied from 0.52 to 0.57, respectively, and was observer-dependent. For the pooled group of PE, pneumonia, and COPD, the intra-modality agreement of perfusion abnormalities was 0.76 for MRI and 0.65 for V-P scan, and the inter-modality agreement varied from 0.51 to 0.56. The kappa value for inter-observer agreement for MRI diagnosis was 0.92. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of perfusion abnormalities in PE, pneumonia, and COPD using perfusion MRI and V-P scan showed a high intra-modality agreement that was higher than the inter-modality agreement. Further studies are now needed in patients presenting with possible PE to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the method.
机译:目的:在研究肺栓塞(PE)灌注异常时,比较灌注磁共振成像(MRI)和通气灌注显像(VP扫描),并将PE结果与先前报道的肺炎和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的发现进行比较(COPD),就灌注异常而言。材料与方法:研究了20例PE患者,11例急性肺炎和13例COPD急性加重患者的动态对比增强MR图像和V-P扫描。定义了每种成像方式内的五种灌注异常。基于每个影像学模式的两名观察者(彼此不知情和真正的诊断),计算了灌注异常评估中的模内和模间一致性(kappa值)。最后,还定义了三类灌注MRI诊断(PE,肺炎和COPD),并计算了观察者之间的一致性(kappa值)。结果:对于PE,MRI灌注异常评估中的模态内一致性(kappa值)为0.77,V-P扫描为0.65。联运方式协议分别从0.52到0.57不等,并且取决于观察者。对于合并的PE,肺炎和COPD组,MRI灌注异常的模态内一致性为0.76,V-P扫描的灌注异常模态内一致性为0.65,而模态间一致性从0.51到0.56不等。观察者之间对MRI诊断的一致性的卡帕值为0.92。结论:使用灌注MRI和V-P扫描评估PE,肺炎和COPD的灌注异常,显示出较高的模态内一致性,高于模态间一致性。现在需要对可能患有PE的患者进行进一步研究,以评估该方法的敏感性和特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号