首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual-bolus contrast-enhanced first-pass MRI technique in humans.
【24h】

Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual-bolus contrast-enhanced first-pass MRI technique in humans.

机译:使用双剂量对比增强的首过MRI技术对人体进行定量心肌灌注分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare fully quantitative and semiquantitative analysis of rest and stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) using a dual-bolus first-pass perfusion MRI method in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rest and dipyridamole stress perfusion imaging was performed on 10 healthy humans by administering gadolinium contrast using a dual-bolus protocol. Ventricular and myocardial time-signal intensity curves were generated from a series of T1-weighted images and adjusted for surface-coil intensity variations. Corrected signal intensity curves were then fitted using fully quantitative model constrained deconvolution (MCD) to quantify MBF (mL/min/g) and MPR. The results were compared with semiquantitative contrast enhancement ratio (CER) and upslope index (SLP) measurements. RESULTS: MBF (mL/min/g) estimated with MCD averaged 1.02 +/- 0.22 at rest and 3.39 +/- 0.59 for stress with no overlap in measures. MPR was 3.43 +/- 0.71, 1.91 +/- 0.65, and 1.16 +/- 0.19 using MCD, SLP, and CER. Both semiquantitative parameters (SLP and CER) significantly underestimated MPR (P < 0.001) and failed to completely discriminate rest and stress perfusion. CONCLUSION: Rest and stress MBF (mL/min/g) and MPR estimated by dual-bolus perfusion MRI fit within published ranges. Semiquantitative methods (SLP and CER) significantly underestimated MPR.
机译:目的:比较使用双剂量首过灌注MRI方法对人体的静息和应激心肌血流量(MBF)和心肌灌注储备(MPR)进行的完全定量和半定量分析。材料与方法:通过使用双剂量方案对g进行对比,对10名健康人进行了静息和潘生丁应力灌注成像。从一系列T1加权图像生成心室和心肌时间信号强度曲线,并针对表面线圈强度变化进行调整。然后使用完全定量模型约束反卷积(MCD)拟合校正后的信号强度曲线,以量化MBF(mL / min / g)和MPR。将结果与半定量对比度增强比(CER)和上坡指数(SLP)测量进行比较。结果:MCD估计的MBF(mL / min / g)静止时平均为1.02 +/- 0.22,而压力的平均值为3.39 +/- 0.59,测量值无重叠。使用MCD,SLP和CER的MPR为3.43 +/- 0.71、1.91 +/- 0.65和1.16 +/- 0.19。两个半定量参数(SLP和CER)都大大低估了MPR(P <0.001),并且不能完全区分休息和压力灌注。结论:静息和压力MBF(mL / min / g)和MPR通过双次推注灌注MRI估计在公开范围内。半定量方法(SLP和CER)大大低估了MPR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号