...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical ethics >Payment of research participants: Current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees
【24h】

Payment of research participants: Current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees

机译:研究参与者的报酬:爱尔兰研究伦理委员会的现行做法和政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Payment of research participants helps to increase recruitment for research studies, but can pose ethical dilemmas. Research ethics committees (RECs) have a centrally important role in guiding this practice, but standardisation of the ethical approval process in Ireland is lacking. Aim Our aim was to examine REC policies, experiences and concerns with respect to the payment of participants in research projects in Ireland. Method Postal survey of all RECs in Ireland. Results Response rate was 62.5% (n=50). 80% of RECs reported not to have any established policy on the payment of research subjects while 20% had refused ethics approval to studies because the investigators proposed to pay research participants. The most commonly cited concerns were the potential for inducement and undermining of voluntary consent. Conclusions There is considerable variability among RECs on the payment of research participants and a lack of clear consensus guidelines on the subject. The development of standardised guidelines on the payment of research subjects may enhance recruitment of research participants.
机译:背景研究参与者的报酬有助于增加研究研究的招募人数,但可能造成道德困境。研究伦理委员会(RECs)在指导这种做法方面起着核心作用,但是爱尔兰缺乏伦理批准程序的标准化。目的我们的目的是研究与爱尔兰研究项目参与者的薪酬有关的REC政策,经验和关注点。方法对爱尔兰所有REC进行邮政调查。结果回应率为62.5%(n = 50)。 80%的REC表示对研究对象的付款没有任何既定政策,而20%的人拒绝对研究进行道德规范批准,因为研究者提议向研究参与者付款。最常被提及的担忧是可能诱发和破坏自愿同意。结论REC之间在研究参与者的报酬方面存在很大差异,并且缺乏关于该主题的明确共识指南。关于研究对象付费的标准化指南的制定可以增强研究参与者的招募。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号