...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical ethics >Priority to registered donors on the waiting list for postmortal organs? A critical look at the objections.
【24h】

Priority to registered donors on the waiting list for postmortal organs? A critical look at the objections.

机译:在死后器官的等待名单上优先于登记的捐赠者?批判性地看待异议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It has often been proposed to restrict access to postmortal organs to registered donors, or at least to give them priority on the waiting list. Such proposals are motivated by considerations of fairness: everyone benefits from the existence of a pool of available organs and of an organised system of distributing them and it is unfair that people who are prepared to contribute to this public good are duped by people who are not. This paper spells out this rationale and goes on to discuss the main principled objections that have been brought forward to such proposals. The most fundamental objection is that healthcare resources should be allocated in accordance with need, not with merit. The reply to this objection is that the principle of allocation according to need only holds in cases in which the provision of such resources and the fair distribution of the burdens of contribution are independently secured, as they are in an obligatory insurance system.
机译:经常有人建议限制已登记的捐赠者进入死后器官,或至少在等待名单上给予它们优先权。这样的提议是出于公平考虑:每个人都受益于现有可用器官的库和有组织的分配器官的系统的存在,准备为这种公共物品做出贡献的人被那些不愿为人服务的人欺骗是不公平的。 。本文阐明了这一基本原理,并继续讨论了对此类提议提出的主要原则性反对意见。最根本的反对意见是,医疗资源应根据需要而不是根据优点进行分配。对此异议的答复是,只有在必须保证这种资源的提供和分摊负担的公平分配的情况下(如在强制性保险制度中),才根据需要分配原则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号