...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical engineering & technology >Comparative accuracy of fitness tracking modalities in quantifying energy expenditure
【24h】

Comparative accuracy of fitness tracking modalities in quantifying energy expenditure

机译:健身追踪方法在量化能量消耗方面的相对准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of wrist-worn, consumer-grade pedometers and earbud sensor technology in quantifying energy expenditure. Nineteen participants (24.6 ±3.1 years) performed 5min exercise stages on a treadmill (80.5 m/min, 107.3 m/min, 134.1 m/min and 160.9 m/min) while measuring energy expenditure via the Fitbit Charge pedometer and Jabra Sport Pulse Wireless Earbuds, comparing with indirect calorimetry. Paired samples f-tests were used to calculate differences and Pearson correlations to examine associations between kcals measured from the Fitbit and Jabra earbuds from indirect calorimetry. Results indicate significant underestimations of kcals for both devices at all speeds except one (Jabra earbuds at 107.3 m/min). Moderate correlations were observed for the Fitbit at 107.3 m/min and 107.3 m/min, and 134.1 m/min for the Jabra earbuds. Both devices considerably underestimated kcals, suggesting that caution be used when incorporating such data into fitness/health goals.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较腕戴式,消费级计步器和耳塞式传感器技术在量化能量消耗方面的准确性。 19位参与者(24.6±3.1岁)在跑步机上分别进行了5分钟的锻炼(80.5 m / min,107.3 m / min,134.1 m / min和160.9 m / min),同时通过Fitbit Charge计步器和Jabra Sport Pulse Wireless测量能量消耗与间接量热法比较的耳塞。配对的样本f检验用于计算差异和Pearson相关性,以检查从Fitbit和通过间接量热法测得的Jabra耳塞所测得的大卡。结果表明,除了一个速度(Jabra耳塞以107.3 m / min的速度)外,所有设备在所有速度下的kcal均被低估。 Fitbit在107.3 m / min和107.3 m / min以及Jabra耳塞的134.1 m / min处观察到中等相关性。两种设备都大大低估了大卡,建议将此类数据纳入健身/健康目标时要谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号