...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematical Psychology >Testing lexicographic semiorders as models of decision making: Priority dominance, integration, interaction, and transitivity
【24h】

Testing lexicographic semiorders as models of decision making: Priority dominance, integration, interaction, and transitivity

机译:测试字典序半序作为决策模型:优先级优势,整合,交互和可传递性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Three new properties are devised to test a family of lexicographic semiorder models of risky decision making. Lexicographic semiorder models imply priority dominance, the principle that when an attribute with priority determines a choice, no variation of other attributes can overcome that preference. Attribute integration tests whether two changes in attributes that are too small, individually, to be decisive can combine to reverse a preference. Attribute interaction tests whether preference due to a given contrast can be reversed by changing an attribute that is the same in both alternatives. These three properties, combined with the property of transitivity, allow us to compare four classes of models. Four new studies show that priority dominance is systematically violated, that most people integrate attributes, and that most people show interactions between probability and consequences. In addition, very few people show the pattern of intransitivity predicted by the priority heuristic, which is a variant of a lexicographic semiorder model with additional features chosen to reproduce certain previous data. When individual data are analyzed in these three new tests, it is found that few people exhibit data compatible with any of the lexicographic semiorder models. The most frequent patterns of individual data are those implied by Birnbaum's transfer of attention model with parameters used in previous research. These results show that the family of lexicographic semiorders is not a good description of how people make risky decisions.
机译:设计了三个新属性来测试风险决策的字典半顺序模型族。字典半顺序模型暗指优先级优势,即当具有优先级的属性确定选择时,其他属性的任何变化都不能克服该优先级的原理。属性集成测试是否可以将属性中两个过小的更改(单独起决定作用)组合起来以反转偏好。属性交互作用测试是否可以通过更改两个替代方案中相同的属性来逆转由于给定对比度引起的偏好。这三个属性与传递性的属性相结合,使我们可以比较四类模型。四项新研究表明,优先控制被系统性地破坏了,大多数人整合了属性,并且大多数人显示了概率和后果之间的相互作用。此外,很少有人显示优先级启发式算法预测的不及物性模式,这是字典半顺序模型的一种变体,具有选择来重现某些先前数据的其他功能。在这三个新测试中分析单个数据时,发现很少有人展示出与任何字典半顺序模型兼容的数据。单个数据最常见的模式是Birnbaum转移注意力模型所隐含的那些,该模型具有先前研究中使用的参数。这些结果表明,按字典顺序排列的半家庭并不能很好地描述人们如何做出危险的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号