首页> 外文期刊>Journal of low frequency noise, vibration and active control >Annoyance Related to Low Frequency Noise in Subjective Assessment of Workers
【24h】

Annoyance Related to Low Frequency Noise in Subjective Assessment of Workers

机译:工人主观评估中与低频噪声相关的烦恼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to assess annoyance related to low frequency noise(LFN) in employees of the control rooms and office-like areas. Subjects were 276 workers, aged 26-62 years, exposed to noise at A-weightedsound pressure level (SPL) of 41-6 dB. They were asked to assess noiseannoyance at their workplace using a 100 point graphical scale. The subjectiveratings were compared with various noise metrics and objective evaluationsbased on proposed LFN exposure criteria for occupational settings. There was a difference in annoyance assessment related to noise with andwithout (or with less prominent) low frequency content. Low frequency noisewas rated as more annoying even though it was at lower dBA levels.Among the noise metrics, the low frequency A-weighted SPL yielded thehighest correlation with subjective evaluations of LFN. There was also a quitegood agreement between individual annoyance ratings and limit excessescorresponding to preliminary Swedish and Polish exposure criteria.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估与控制室和类似办公室的员工的低频噪声(LFN)相关的烦恼。受试者为276名年龄在26-62岁的工人,他们在A加权声压级(SPL)为41-6 dB的情况下暴露于噪声中。他们被要求使用100点图形量表来评估其工作场所的噪音厌烦。根据提议的针对职业环境的LFN暴露标准,将主观评估与各种噪声指标和客观评估进行比较。在有和没有(或不那么突出)低频成分的噪音方面,烦恼评估存在差异。低频噪声即使在较低的dBA级别也被认为更令人讨厌。在噪声指标中,低频A加权SPL与LFN的主观评估产生最高的相关性。在个人烦恼等级和与瑞典和波兰的初步暴露标准相对应的限值过量之间也达成了很好的协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号