首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean Forestry Society >Comparison of a Point-Grid-Method and a Buffering-Method to Calculate Skidding Distance for Timber Harvest Planning
【24h】

Comparison of a Point-Grid-Method and a Buffering-Method to Calculate Skidding Distance for Timber Harvest Planning

机译:点格法与缓冲法计算木材采伐规划集材距离的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The investigation was accomplished on the test area in Forest Practice Research Center in order to compare Point Grid method with Bufferring method in process of the calculation of the Actual Mean Skidding Distance with the GIS aided harvesting method. the investigation site amounted to 264.9 ha in area and 32.67 in in the road density, 306.1 m in road spacing. the Net Correction Factor (Kn) was 1.53 in both sides skidding. the theoretical mean skidding distance was 72.52 m. the shortest mean skidding distance amounted to 149.57 in with point grid method and 139.68 m with Buffering methode. skidding distance correction factor (Kr) was 2.15. actual mean skidding distance amounted to 251.51 in and factor of wood assortment skidding (Kg) was 3.29. when the tractor (Dongyang) and tower yader (Koller 303) are used on investigation site, the logging cost is calculated 11,808 Won with Tractor below 25% slope and 12,336 won with Tractor between 25 similar to 55% slope, 10,020 won with Tower Yarder more than 55% slope.
机译:为了在使用GIS辅助采伐方法计算实际平均滑移距离的过程中比较点网格法和缓冲环法,在森林实践研究中心的测试区域进行了调查。调查地点面积264.9公顷,道路密度32.67公顷,道路间距306.1 m。两侧打滑的净校正因子(Kn)为1.53。理论平均滑移距离为72.52 m。点网格法最短平均滑移距离为149.57,缓冲法最短平均滑移距离为139.68 m。滑移距离校正因子(Kr)为2.15。实际平均滑移距离为251.51英寸,木材分类滑移(Kg)因子为3.29。当在调查现场使用拖拉机(东阳)和塔雅德(Koller 303)时,测算成本为:坡度低于25%的拖拉机为11808韩元,坡度在25%且接近55%的拖拉机为12336韩元,塔尔德机为10020韩元坡度超过55%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号