首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Internal Medicine >Gender differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors, treatments and complications in patients with type 2 diabetes: The RIACE Italian multicentre study
【24h】

Gender differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors, treatments and complications in patients with type 2 diabetes: The RIACE Italian multicentre study

机译:2型糖尿病患者心血管疾病危险因素,治疗和并发症的性别差异:RIACE意大利多中心研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: Poorer control of risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been reported in diabetic women, as compared with diabetic men. It has been proposed that this finding is due to gender disparities in treatment intensity. We investigated this hypothesis in a large contemporary cohort of subjects with type 2 diabetes. Design: Observational, cross-sectional study. Subjects and setting: Consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes from the Renal Insufficiency And Cardiovascular Events (RIACE) Italian multicentre study (n = 15 773), attending 19 hospital-based diabetes clinics in 2007-2008. Main outcome measures: Traditional CVD risk factors, macro- and microvascular complications and current glucose-, lipid- and blood pressure (BP)-lowering treatments were assessed. Results: Although CVD was more prevalent in men, women showed a less favourable CVD risk profile and worse performance in achieving treatment targets for haemoglobin A1c, LDL, HDL and non-HDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure (BP) and in particular obesity [body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference], but not for triglycerides and diastolic BP. However, women were more frequently receiving pharmacological treatment for hypertension and to a lesser extent hyperglycaemia and dyslipidaemia than men, and female gender remained an independent predictor of unmet therapeutic targets after adjustment for confounders such as treatments, BMI, duration of diabetes and, except for the systolic BP goal, age. Conclusions: In women with type 2 diabetes from the RIACE cohort, a more adverse CVD risk profile and a higher likelihood of failing treatment targets, compared with men, were not associated with treatment differences. This suggests that factors other than gender disparities in treatment intensity are responsible.
机译:目的:与糖尿病男子相比,糖尿病妇女对心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素的控制较差。已经提出该发现是由于治疗强度的性别差异。我们在当代2型糖尿病患者的大型队列中研究了这一假设。设计:观察性横断面研究。受试者和背景:肾功能不全和心血管事件(RIACE)的2型糖尿病连续患者意大利多中心研究(n = 15773),于2007-2008年期间在19家医院级糖尿病诊所就诊。主要结局指标:评估了传统的CVD危险因素,大血管和微血管并发症以及目前降低血糖,脂质和血压(BP)的治疗方法。结果:尽管CVD在男性中更为普遍,但是女性在获得血红蛋白A1c,LDL,HDL和非HDL胆固醇,收缩压(BP)尤其是肥胖[身体]的治疗目标方面表现出较差的CVD风险特征,并且表现较差。质量指数(BMI)和腰围],但不适用于甘油三酸酯和舒张压BP。但是,与男性相比,女性更常接受针对高血压以及高血糖和血脂异常的药物治疗,并且在调整了诸如治疗,BMI,糖尿病持续时间等混杂因素后,女性仍然是未达到治疗目标的独立预测指标。收缩压目标,年龄。结论:在RIACE队列研究的2型糖尿病女性中,与男性相比,较不利的CVD风险特征和失败的治疗目标可能性与男性的治疗差异无关。这表明在治疗强度上除性别差异以外的其他因素也是造成这种情况的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号