首页> 外文期刊>Journal of knowledge management >Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals
【24h】

Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals

机译:知识管理和智力资本学术期刊的全球排名

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals. Design/methodology/approach - An online questionnaire was completed by 233 active knowledge management and intellectual capital researchers from 41 countries. Two different approaches: journal rank-order and journal scoring method were utilized and produced similar results. Findings - It was found that the top five academic journals in the field are: Journal of Knowledge Management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, International Journal of Knowledge Management, and The Learning Organization. It was also concluded that the major factors affecting perceptions of quality of academic journals are editor and review board reputation, inclusion in citation indexes, opinion of leading researchers, appearance in ranking lists, and citation impact. Research limitations/implications - This study was the first of its kind to develop a ranking system for academic journals in the field. Such a list will be very useful for academic recruitment, as well as tenure and promotion decisions. Practical implications - The findings from this study may be utilized by various practitioners including knowledge management professionals, university administrators, review committees and corporate librarians. Originality/value - This paper represents the first documented attempt to develop a ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals through a survey of field contributors.
机译:目的-本文的目的是发展知识管理和智力资本学术期刊的全球排名。设计/方法/方法-来自41个国家/地区的233位积极知识管理人员和智力资本研究人员完成了在线问卷调查。两种不同的方法:期刊等级排序和期刊评分方法被使用,并产生相似的结果。调查结果-发现该领域排名前五位的学术期刊是:知识管理杂志,智力资本杂志,知识管理研究与实践,国际知识管理杂志和学习型组织。得出的结论是,影响学术期刊质量认知的主要因素是编辑者和评审委员会的声誉,引文索引的纳入,领先研究人员的意见,排名列表的出现以及引文影响。研究局限性/含义-该研究是针对该领域学术期刊开发排名系统的同类研究中的第一项。这样的清单对于学术招聘以及任期和晋升决定将非常有用。实际意义-这项研究的结果可能被包括知识管理专业人员,大学行政人员,审核委员会和企业图书馆员在内的各种从业者利用。原创性/价值-本文是通过对现场贡献者进行的调查来首次建立文献记载的尝试,以对知识管理和智力资本学术期刊进行排名。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号