首页> 外文期刊>Coal Age >Combining the Benefits of Dry and Liquid Agents for a Better Fire Suppression System
【24h】

Combining the Benefits of Dry and Liquid Agents for a Better Fire Suppression System

机译:结合使用干粉剂和液体剂的优点,以获得更好的灭火系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the fire suppression industry, some have begun claiming that a liquid-only system is superior to a dual-agent system. The primary reason for this stance is the simplicity factor of using only one agent. However, this line of thought neglects to consider the fact that liquid-only systems needlessly sacrifice the benefits of A:B:C dry agent for the mere purpose of a marketing campaign. For decades, A:B:C dry chemical has been the standard firefighting agent of choice across the professional vehicle fire suppression industry. It is known for a fast knockdown of flames and for the fact that it fills a volume of space, which makes it perfect for use in enclosed areas like engine compartments. As a result of this 3-D coverage, pound for pound, dry chemical agent is very efficient. These attributes make it as ideal for keeping a fire from spreading today as they did 50 years ago. This is also why the vast majority of handheld fire extinguishers continue to be filled with A:B:C powder, as it is proven and can be used effectively against debris, fuel and electrical fires.
机译:在灭火行业中,一些人开始声称纯液体系统优于双剂系统。这种立场的主要原因是仅使用一种代理的简单性。但是,这种思路忽略了这样一个事实,即纯液体系统仅出于营销活动的目的而不必要地牺牲了A:B:C干剂的好处。几十年来,A:B:C干粉一直是专业车辆灭火行业中首选的标准灭火剂。众所周知,它能迅速击落火焰,并充满一定的空间,因此非常适合在封闭的区域(例如发动机舱)中使用。由于这种3-D覆盖,一磅一磅的干燥化学试剂非常有效。这些属性使其成为防止火势蔓延的理想之选,就像50年前一样。这也是为什么绝大多数手持式灭火器继续充满A:B:C粉末的原因,事实证明,这种粉末可以有效地扑灭碎屑,燃料和电火。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Coal Age》 |2015年第11期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 煤矿开采;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号