...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of laparoendoscopic and advanced surgical techniques, Part A >Comparative laparoscopic evaluation of the PROLENE polypropylene hernia system vs. the PerFix plug repair in a porcine groin hernia repair model.
【24h】

Comparative laparoscopic evaluation of the PROLENE polypropylene hernia system vs. the PerFix plug repair in a porcine groin hernia repair model.

机译:在猪腹股沟疝气修复模型中,比较腹腔镜对PROLENE聚丙烯疝气系统与PerFix栓塞修复的评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Both the PROLENE Polypropylene Hernia System (Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, Cincinnati, OH) and plug-and-patch devices including the Bard PerFix Plug repair (C.R. Bard. Inc., Murray Hill, NJ) are currently used in open groin herniorrhaphy. These systems rely on incorporating two mesh prostheses of different designs. In this animal study, early results for the two types of device were compared laparoscopically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four uncastrated male pigs (average weight, 25 kg) were randomized into two groups of 12 each for repair of unilateral groin hernia defects with the PROLENE Hernia System (Prolene) or the PerFix Plug (PerFix). Laparoscopic examination was performed immediately after the surgery to check the configuration and coverage area of the preperitoneally positioned mesh devices, with stress-loading tests to compare their primary efficiency. RESULTS: By contrast to the PerFix prostheses, in which the preperitoneal cone-shaped mesh only obliterated the primary fascial defect, in two-thirds of the Prolene repairs the flat and widely deployed underlay patch not only overlapped the defect but also covered the entire myopectineal orifice. Under heavy stress loading (25 newtons), the Prolene group also had a significantly lower incidence of fascial defect exposure in comparison to the PerFix counterparts (P = 0.003). In the stress-loading tests, four Prolene and eight PerFix plugs failed (P >0.005), mainly due to tissue disruption. CONCLUSION: Properly implanted Prolene devices have a wider coverage area and lower risk of fascial defect exposure and thus should be the treatment of choice for large groin hernia defects where the inguinal floor is attenuated. Where the PerFix devices are used under these conditions, they must be adequately secured to a healthy fascial edge, with onlay coverage patches to eliminate any weak points that might cause early recurrence.
机译:背景:PROLENE聚丙烯疝气系统(Ethicon,Johnson&Johnson,俄亥俄州辛辛那提)和包括Bard PerFix塞修复的即插即用设备(CR Bard。Inc.,Murray Hill,NJ)目前都用于露天腹股沟。疝气。这些系统依靠结合不同设计的两个网状假体。在这项动物研究中,腹腔镜比较了两种器械的早期结果。材料与方法:将24头未cast割的雄性猪(平均体重25公斤)随机分为两组,每组12只,用PROLENE疝气系统(Prolene)或PerFix塞子(PerFix)修复单侧腹股沟疝。手术后立即进行腹腔镜检查,以检查腹膜前定位网状装置的结构和覆盖范围,并进行压力负荷测试以比较其主要功效。结果:与PerFix假体相反,在PerFix假体中,腹膜前圆锥形网眼仅能消除主要的筋膜缺损,在三分之二的Prolene修复中,平坦且广泛部署的基底膜不仅与缺损重叠,而且覆盖了整个肌皮孔。在重负荷(25牛顿)下,与PerFix相比,Prolene组的筋膜缺损暴露率也显着降低(P = 0.003)。在压力加载测试中,四个Prolene插头和八个PerFix插头失败(P> 0.005),主要是由于组织破裂。结论:正确植入的Prolene装置具有更宽的覆盖范围,并且筋膜缺损暴露的风险较低,因此应作为腹股沟底衰减的大腹股沟疝缺损的治疗选择。在这种情况下使用PerFix设备时,必须将其固定在健康的筋膜边缘,并贴上覆盖贴片,以消除可能导致早期复发的任何弱点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号