...
【24h】

WILL A MARSHALL PLAN FOR AFRICA MAKE POVERTY HISTORY?

机译:制定非洲贫困历史的马歇尔计划吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A large increase in aid for Africa is a priority for both UK government and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in 2005. Despite a history of aid dependence and low growth, there is evidence that aid has a positive effect in Africa. But more aid alone will not produce rapid growth and poverty reduction. Africa's governance record is very poor and attempts at governance reform have largely failed without commitment from leaders. Equally, the policy conditionality debate shows that domestic political considerations have driven the shaping of economic policy, more than donor pressures. The clientelist account of African politics provides a coherent explanation for poor governance, partial and gradual policy change, and also the failure of governance reforms. It also points to a different policy agenda for aid.
机译:2005年,英国政府和非政府组织(NGOs)都将对非洲的援助大幅度增加作为优先事项。尽管有援助依赖和增长缓慢的历史,但有证据表明,援助对非洲产生了积极影响。但是单靠更多的援助并不能实现快速增长和减贫。非洲的治理记录非常差,没有领导人的承诺,治理改革的尝试在很大程度上失败了。同样,政策条件性辩论表明,国内政治考虑推动了经济政策的形成,而不仅仅是捐助方的压力。客户对非洲政治的论述为治理不善,部分和渐进的政策变化以及治理改革的失败提供了连贯的解释。它还指出了不同的援助政策议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号