首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Freshwater Ecology >Comparison of benthic macro invertebrates colonizing sand, wood, and artificial substrates in a low-gradient stream
【24h】

Comparison of benthic macro invertebrates colonizing sand, wood, and artificial substrates in a low-gradient stream

机译:比较底栖大无脊椎动物在低梯度流中定居在沙子,木材和人造基质上

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared macroinvertebrate assemblages sampled from artificial and natural substrates within a small, sandy-bottomed coastal plain stream, Alabama, USA. Separate samples were collected from natural coarse woody debris (CWD) accumulations, benthic sand substrate, and Hester-Dendy multiplate samplers (HDs, 54-d incubations). Shannon's H' was lowest and % dominant taxon was highest in sand samples. Proportion of the total assemblage as EPT taxa (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) was significantly higher on HDs than from sand, and proportion of the assemblage as Chironomidae was higher from sand than on CWD. Invertebrate biomass on HDs was almost two times higher than from sand, whereas biomass from sand was nearly an order of magnitude higher than biomass on CWD. TWINSPAN indicated CWD and HDs assemblages were distinctive from sand substrates, largely because of differential abundance of the midges Rheotanytarsus sp., Thienemanniella sp., Rheosmittia sp., and Polypedilum sp., the mayfly Stenonema smithae, and Cladocera. A subsequent splitting, based on relatively large abundance of Thienemanniella sp. and Oligochaeta in CWD, separated HDs and CWD assemblages. Our results suggest that HDs are not a quantitative mimic of either sand or CWD, leading us to conclude that the use of HDs is not a comprehensive substitute for sampling fauna established on natural sand or wood substrates in streams.
机译:我们比较了在美国阿拉巴马州一个沙质底的沿海平原小溪中,从人工和天然基质中采集的大型无脊椎动物组合。从天然粗木屑(CWD)堆积物,底砂基质和Hester-Dendy多板采样器(HD,54天培养)中收集单独的样品。在沙子样品中,香农的H'最低,占主导地位的分类单元最高。在HD上,总组合作为EPT分类群(星翅目,鞘翅目和毛鳞翅目)的比例显着高于沙子,而Chironomidae的总比例在沙子上高于CWD。 HDs上的无脊椎动物生物量几乎比沙子高出两倍,而沙子的生物量比CWD上的生物量高出近一个数量级。 TWINSPAN指出,CWD和HDs组合物与沙质底物不同,这主要是由于Rheotanytarsus sp。,Thienemanniella sp。,Rheosmittia sp。和Polypedilum sp。,the蝇Stenonema smithae和Cladocera的differential虫丰度不同。基于Thienemanniella sp。相对大量的后续分裂。和CWD中的Oligochaeta,分离的HD和CWD组合。我们的结果表明,HDs既不是沙子也不是CWD的定量模拟,这使我们得出结论,HDs不能完全代替在河流中天然沙子或木质底物上建立的动物采样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号