首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health politics, policy and law >A Few Thoughts about ACO Antitrust Issues from a Local Enforcement Perspective
【24h】

A Few Thoughts about ACO Antitrust Issues from a Local Enforcement Perspective

机译:从地方执法角度对ACO反托拉斯问题的几点思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Accountable care organizations (ACOs), joint ventures of commercial insurers and various groups of medical providers such as physicians, specialists, and hospitals whose development in California has been quickened by the Affordable Care Act, carry with them both promise and pitfalls. On the positive side of the ledger, ACOs may improve the quality of medical care even as they lower the costs of that care. On the negative side of the ledger, ACOs may lead to a gain in market power for their participations, allowing those participants to increase the prices they charge to commercial insurers. It is thus a key question for antitrust enforcers to figure out how to separate the sheep from the goats.. This article, representing our personal views as state antitrust enforcers in the California attorney general's office, offers our reflection on a number of ACO articles and studies in this special issue through the prism of this key question and sets out a number of additional issues that we believe warrant study in conjunction with ACOs.
机译:责任医疗组织(ACO),商业保险公司的合资企业以及各种医疗服务提供商(例如医师,专科医生和医院),通过《负担得起的医疗法案》加快了在加利福尼亚的发展,这既带来了希望,也带来了陷阱。从分类帐的正面来看,ACO可以提高医疗质量,即使它们降低了医疗费用。从分类账的不利方面来看,ACO可能会导致其参与的市场力量增强,从而使这些参与者能够提高向商业保险公司收取的价格。因此,这是反托拉斯强制执行者要弄清楚如何将羊与山羊分开的关键问题。本文代表了我们在加利福尼亚州司法部长办公室作为州反托拉斯强制执行者的个人观点,为我们对ACO的许多条款和建议提供了思考。通过这个关键问题的角度对这个特殊问题进行研究,并提出了一些我们认为需要与ACO一起研究的其他问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号