...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of human hypertension >Are there really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure? Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor.
【24h】

Are there really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure? Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor.

机译:家庭和日间动态血压之间确实有区别吗?使用新型双模式动态和家用显示器进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Several studies compared blood pressure (BP) at home (HBP) with ambulatory BP (ABP), but using different devices, which contribute to differences in measured BP. A novel dual-mode device allowing ABP and HBP monitoring (Microlife WatchBPO3) was validated according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol and used to compare the two methods. In the validation study, 33 subjects were assessed with simultaneous BP measurements taken by 2 observers (connected mercury sphygmomanometers) 4 times, sequentially with 3 measurements taken using the tested device. Absolute observer-device BP differences were classified within 5/10/15 mm Hg zones. Measurements with
机译:几项研究比较了家庭血压(HBP)与动态血压(ABP),但使用了不同的设备,这导致了所测得的BP的差异。一种新型的允许ABP和HBP监测的双模设备(Microlife WatchBPO3)已根据欧洲高血压学会国际协议进行了验证,并用于比较这两种方法。在验证研究中,对33位受试者进行评估,同时由2位观察员(连接的水银血压计)进行4次同时BP测量,依次使用被测设备进行3次测量。在5/10/15 mm Hg区域内对观察者与设备的绝对BP差异进行了分类。每位参与者计算出Hg差异小于或等于5毫米的测量值。在验证研究中,该设备分别在5/10/15 mm Hg内产生70/89/96的收缩压和67/95/99的舒张压测量值。 28名受试者的收缩压差异至少为2个,或≤5mm Hg,1名受试者的收缩压差异为,或≤5mm Hg,而舒张压分别为22和1个受试者。装置观察者的平均BP差为-0.3 +/- 5.6 / -2.4 +/- 4.8 mm Hg(收缩压/舒张压)。在应用研究中,收缩压的白天ABP和HBP之间的差异为0.5 +/- 7.9 mm Hg(平均值+/-标准偏差,95%置信区间(CI)-1.9、2.9,P = NS)和0.6 + /舒张压为-5.5(95%CI -1.1,2.3,P = NS)。总之,用于ABP和HBP监控的Microlife WatchBPO3设备符合国际协议验证标准。使用此设备,白天ABP和HBP之间没有发现临床上重要的差异。这些数据证明对两种方法使用相同的诊断阈值是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号