...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hand Surgery. American Volume >Scratch collapse test for evaluation of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome.
【24h】

Scratch collapse test for evaluation of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome.

机译:划痕试验用于评估腕管和肘管综合征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of a new test, the scratch collapse test, for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and cubital tunnel syndrome. METHODS: The scratch collapse test was prospectively compared with Tinel's sign and flexionerve compression in 169 patients and 109 controls. One hundred nineteen patients were diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome and 70 patients were diagnosed with cubital tunnel syndrome based on history, examination, and positive electrodiagnostic test. For the new test, the patient resisted bilateral shoulder external rotation with elbows flexed. The area of suspected nerve compression was lightly "scratched," and then resisted shoulder external rotation was immediately repeated. Momentary loss of shoulder external rotation resistance on the affected side was considered a positive test. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: For carpal tunnel syndrome, sensitivities were 64%, 32%, and 44% for the scratch collapse test, Tinel's test, and wrist flexion/compression test, respectively. For cubital tunnel syndrome, sensitivities were 69%, 54%, and 46% for the scratch collapse test, Tinel test, and elbow flexion/compression test, respectively. The scratch collapse test had the highest negative predictive value (73%) for carpal tunnel syndrome. Tinel's test had the highest negative predictive value (98%) for cubital tunnel syndrome. Specificity and positive predictive values were high for all of the tests. CONCLUSIONS: The scratch collapse test had significantly higher sensitivity than Tinel's test and the flexionerve compression test for carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel syndromes. Accuracy for this test was 82% for carpal tunnel syndrome and 89% for cubital tunnel syndrome. This novel test provides a useful addition to existing clinical maneuvers in the diagnosis of these common nerve compression syndromes. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估刮擦塌陷试验这一新测试方法对腕管综合症和肘管综合症的诊断的临床实用性。方法:前瞻性比较了169例患者和109例对照的划痕塌陷测试与Tinel的体征和屈曲/神经压迫。根据病史,检查和电诊断阳性结果,共诊断出119例腕管综合症和70例肘管综合症。对于新测试,患者在屈肘时抵抗双侧肩膀的外部旋转。疑似神经受压的区域被轻度“划伤”,然后立即重复抵抗肩膀的外部旋转。患侧肩部外旋转阻力的短暂丧失被认为是阳性试验。计算敏感性,特异性和预测值。结果:对于腕管综合症,划痕塌陷试验,Tinel试验和腕部弯曲/压缩试验的敏感性分别为64%,32%和44%。对于肘管综合征,划痕塌陷试验,Tinel试验和肘部弯曲/压缩试验的敏感性分别为69%,54%和46%。刮tunnel塌陷试验对腕管综合症的阴性预测值最高(73%)。 Tinel检验对肘管综合征的阴性预测值最高(98%)。所有测试的特异性和阳性预测值均很高。结论:对于腕管综合症和肘管综合症,划痕塌陷试验的敏感性明显高于Tinel试验和屈曲/神经压缩试验。腕管综合征的准确度为82%,肘管综合征的准确度为89%。这项新颖的测试为诊断这些常见的神经受压综合征提供了有用的方法,可用于现有的临床操作。研究类型/证据级别:诊断II。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号