首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Evolution >The beginning of the Upper Paleolithic in the Iranian Zagros. A taphonomic approach and techno-economic comparison of Early Baradostian assemblages from Warwasi and Yafteh (Iran)
【24h】

The beginning of the Upper Paleolithic in the Iranian Zagros. A taphonomic approach and techno-economic comparison of Early Baradostian assemblages from Warwasi and Yafteh (Iran)

机译:上古旧石器时代始于伊朗的扎格罗斯。来自Warwasi和Yafteh(伊朗)的早期Baradostian组合的方法学方法和技术经济比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Southwest Asia is a key region in current debates surrounding the appearance of the first cultures attributed to anatomically modern humans, particularly the Aurignacian and preceding cultural units of the Iranian Zagros, Levant, and the Balkans (Baradostian, Ahmarien, Kozarnikien, etc.). The Zagros mountain range encompasses an immense territory that remains understudied with regard to the Upper Paleolithic as well as the first bladelet industries traditionally presumed to be the work of anatomically modern humans. Concerning the emergence of the Aurignacian, the sites of Warwasi rockshelter and Yafteh cave in the central Zagros are considered to show evidence of in situ evolution of the Upper Paleolithic from the local Mousterian. This hypothesis is tested by way of a taphonomic, techno-typological and economic approach applied to the Upper Paleolithic levels of Warwasi (spits LL-AA) and Yafteh (the series from the lower part of the sequence). A comparison of the techno-economic features of both assemblages demonstrates a conceptual bond with contemporaneous techno-complexes from Levant and Europe (Ahmarian, Protoaurignacian, etc.). The techno-typological Middle Paleolithic character of the Warwasi lithic assemblage permits a discussion of a possible in situ dependence/continuum from the Mousterian or perhaps particular activities linked to the type of the occupation of the site. However, bladelet technology cannot be considered as rooted in the Zagros Mousterian. Consequently the origin of the Aurignacian sensu stricto has to be reconsidered.
机译:西南亚是当前辩论中的一个重要区域,围绕着起源于解剖学上现代人类的第一批文化的出现,尤其是奥格尼亚古人和伊朗的Zagros,黎凡特和巴尔干地区的先前文化部门(巴拉多斯式,阿马里安式,科萨尔尼克式等)。扎格罗斯山脉涵盖了一个巨大的领域,在上旧石器时代以及传统上被认为是解剖学上现代人的工作的第一个小叶片产业方面,人们仍然对该领域进行了研究。关于Aurignacian的出现,在Zagros中部的Warwasi岩石棚和Yafteh洞穴被认为是从当地Mousterian上古石器时代就地演化的证据。通过对Warwasi(吐出物LL-AA)和Yafteh(从序列的下部开始的序列)的旧石器时代上层应用的分型,技术-类型学和经济方法对这一假设进行了检验。对这两种组合的技术经济特征进行比较,证明了与黎凡特和欧洲(Ahmarian,Protoaurignacian等)的同期技术复合体在概念上的联系。 Warwasi石器组合的技术型中古石器时代特征使得人们可以讨论穆斯特人可能的原地依存关系/连续体,或者可能是与该遗址的类型有关的特定活动。但是,叶片技术不能被认为扎根于扎格罗斯·穆斯特人。因此,必须重新考虑“奥里尼亚克人”的起源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号