...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Missing information in determining reference values of aortic pulse wave velocity in the elderly.
【24h】

Missing information in determining reference values of aortic pulse wave velocity in the elderly.

机译:确定老年人主动脉脉搏波速度参考值时缺少信息。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We have read the study by Alecu et al. [1] with special interest. It was surprising that the authors and reviewers overlooked the meta-analysis that was published in 'Journal of Hypertension, about 2 years ago by our group [2], in which an age-specific reference interval for pulse wave velocity (PWV) was constructed. Although the significant impact of aging on arterial distensibility (in particular central arteries [3]) was proposed as a normal vascular aging process [4-6], the process is also accelerated in conditions such as hypertension, diabetes and renal failure [7]. PWV is also exhibited diversely in different ethnic groups [8], although that mainly influences peripheral arteries [9]. Consequently, an age-specific reference value for PWV is still reliable in central arterial evaluation.
机译:我们已经阅读了Alecu等人的研究。 [1]特别感兴趣。令人惊讶的是,作者和审阅者忽略了我们小组于2年前发表在《高血压杂志》上的荟萃分析[2],其中构建了针对年龄的脉搏波速度(PWV)特定参考区间。尽管衰老对动脉扩张性(特别是中央动脉[3])的显着影响被认为是正常的血管衰老过程[4-6],但在高血压,糖尿病和肾衰竭等情况下,这一过程也会加速[7] 。 PWV在不同种族中也有不同的表现[8],尽管这主要影响外周动脉[9]。因此,在中央动脉评估中,PWV的特定年龄参考值仍然可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号