...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology: Official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology >A differential suction electrode for recording electromyographic activity from the pelvic floor muscles: Crosstalk evaluation
【24h】

A differential suction electrode for recording electromyographic activity from the pelvic floor muscles: Crosstalk evaluation

机译:用于记录盆底肌肉肌电活动的差动吸引电极:串扰评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a differential suction electrode (DSE) probe is less prone to recording crosstalk from the hip adductors or external rotators than the Femiscan~(?) probe when recording electromyography (EMG) data from the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs). Twenty nulliparous, continent women performed hip adduction and hip external rotation contractions at 25%, 50% and 100% of maximal voluntary effort both while keeping their PFMs relaxed and while contracting their PFMs as strongly as possible. All tasks were performed while DSEs were adhered to the vaginal wall at the level of the pubococcygeus group bilaterally, and also with the Femiscan~(?) probe in situ. The order of the probes was randomized. For each task, the peak smoothed PFM EMG amplitude was compared between hip forces and probes using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the interaction between contraction level and probe (α=0.05). There was a significant contraction level by probe interaction for each task. In most cases the Femiscan~(?) probe recorded significantly higher PFM EMG activity during hip adduction and external rotation tasks at 25% and 50% MVC compared to what it recorded when the hip musculature remained relaxed, whereas the DSE probe did not. As such, the DSE probe appears to be less susceptible to crosstalk from the hip adductors and external rotators than the Femiscan~(?) probe at these hip muscle contraction levels. Both probes recorded significantly higher EMG activity when maximal contractions of the hip adductors and external rotators were performed therefore, no conclusion can be made regarding whether the activity recorded from the PFMs during maximal hip adduction and external rotation is the result of crosstalk or co-activation.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定当从骨盆底肌肉记录肌电图(EMG)数据时,与Femiscan〜(?)探头相比,差动吸引电极(DSE)探头是否更不容易记录来自髋关节内收肌或外部旋转器的串扰。 (PFM)。二十名未产妇,大陆妇女以最大自愿努力的25%,50%和100%进行了髋关节内收和髋关节外旋收缩,同时保持其PFM放松并尽可能强烈地收缩PFM。在双侧DSE附着在阴道壁上达到耻骨尾骨组水平的同时执行所有任务,并使用Femiscan〜(?)探针就地进行。探针的顺序是随机的。对于每项任务,使用双向重复测量方差分析(ANOVA),包括收缩水平与探头之间的相互作用(α= 0.05),比较髋部力和探头之间的峰值平滑PFM EMG振幅。通过探针交互作用,每个任务都有明显的收缩水平。在大多数情况下,Femiscan〜(?)探针在髋关节内收和外旋任务中的MVC分别为25%和50%时,记录的PFM EMG活性明显高于髋部肌肉保持放松时的记录,而DSE探针则没有。因此,在这些臀部肌肉收缩水平上,DSE探针似乎比Femiscan_(β)探针更不容易受到髋内收肌和外旋肌的串扰。当进行髋关节内收肌和外旋肌的最大收缩时,两种探针均记录到明显较高的EMG活性,因此,无法得出关于最大内收肌和外旋肌过程中PFMs记录的活性是相声还是共同激活的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号